2020
DOI: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i2.667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological and psychological assessment of patients with oral lichen planus using serum cortisol levels and hads questionnaire—a case control study

Abstract: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a T cell-mediated chronic autoimmune disorder directed against antigens secreted by the basal cell layer, with an incidence of 0.02-0.22% in Indian population and showing female predilection. Stress is considered one of the etiological factors in the causation, progression, and recurrence of this disease. To evaluate the levels of serum cortisol, anxiety, and depression in patients with symptomatic OLP and to correlate the levels of serum cortisol with anxiety and depression. Sixty … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now, a few single‐center studies have evaluated the prevalence of mood disorders in OLP (Adamo et al. 2015; Chaitanya et al., 2020; Manczyk et al. 2019; Vallejo et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until now, a few single‐center studies have evaluated the prevalence of mood disorders in OLP (Adamo et al. 2015; Chaitanya et al., 2020; Manczyk et al. 2019; Vallejo et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, a few single-center studies have evaluated the prevalence of mood disorders in OLP (Adamo et al 2015;Chaitanya et al, 2020;Manczyk et al 2019;Vallejo et al 2001;, analyzing the differences between K-OLP and nK-OLP, with unclear results (Rojo-Moreno et al 1998), and no evident relationships between intensity and quality of pain (Larsen et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 57.14% estimated the serum cortisol levels by using Electrochemiluminescence method,[ 1 3 5 10 ] whereas the remaining methods were ELISA in one study (14.28%),[ 11 ] Chemiluminescence in another study (14.28%),[ 12 ] and Enhanced Lanthanide Fluoroimmunoassay in yet another study (14.28%). [ 13 ] All the seven studies (100%) analyzed serum cortisol levels in both LP and control group, which resulted in statistically higher serum cortisol levels than the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard mean difference of five studies (71.42%) favoring control group were 1.52 μg/dl (0.72,2.31),[ 10 ] 6.69 μg/dl (5.03,8.35),[ 11 ] 0.99 μg/dl (0.41,1.57),[ 3 ] 0.78 μg/dl (0.26,1.31),[ 12 ] and 1.81 μg/dl (1.20,2.42),[ 5 ] respectively. Though there was a statistical significant serum cortisol levels in case group than control group, meta analysis of these five studies does not favor the case group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the studies used a 1) used professional psychometric scales, mainly focusing on anxiety and depression. The following instruments were used: seven studies used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] ; five studies used the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) 9,[22][23][24][25] ; four studies used the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) [26][27][28][29] ; three studies used the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), 28,30,31 ; four used the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Test (HAM-A) [32][33][34][35] ; one study used the Hamilton rating scale for Depression (HAM-D) 34 ; two studies used the Selfrating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) 36,37 ; one study used the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2) 38 ; and one study used the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). 32 Two studies on personality characteristics used the following scales: one study used the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) 36 and the other used the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%