1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00154-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological response of cattle to Brucella allergen after repeated intradermal applications of this allergen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, naive cattle did not have an increase in skinfold thickness >2 mm after repeated injection of 0.1 ml brucellin. Furthermore, naive cattle that were tested with the SDTH test three, four, or five times every three weeks all tested seronegative for brucellosis (71), even though some cattle serologically reacted now and then either with the SAT or CFT. Such a response has no effect on the sero-diagnosis of brucellosis, as the results are not indicative of brucellosis and last less than a week.…”
Section: Sensitizing and Immunogenic Properties Of Brucellin 273mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, naive cattle did not have an increase in skinfold thickness >2 mm after repeated injection of 0.1 ml brucellin. Furthermore, naive cattle that were tested with the SDTH test three, four, or five times every three weeks all tested seronegative for brucellosis (71), even though some cattle serologically reacted now and then either with the SAT or CFT. Such a response has no effect on the sero-diagnosis of brucellosis, as the results are not indicative of brucellosis and last less than a week.…”
Section: Sensitizing and Immunogenic Properties Of Brucellin 273mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that an increase in skinfold thickness >2 mm at the injection site of brucellin may be used as guideline to indicate brucellosis in infected cattle (71). When this cut-off value was applied to naive cattle, none showed a skin reaction 22 mm following several brucellin injections (20).…”
Section: The Value Of the Sdth Test For Surveillance And Eradication mentioning
confidence: 99%