2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks 2011
DOI: 10.1109/lcn.2011.6115202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Server selection and admission control for IP-based video on demand using available bandwidth estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that the network provider is not part of the federation, so the IPTV service provider and storage provider do not have knowledge of the network topology or access to more detailed network monitoring data. As shown in previous work [27,28] available bandwidth estimations are a suitable means of monitoring quality of service and controlling end to end delay for the purposes of IPTV admission control. Users IPTV clients request streaming of content items from the selection server.…”
Section: Illustration Of Slime Mould Content Replicationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assume that the network provider is not part of the federation, so the IPTV service provider and storage provider do not have knowledge of the network topology or access to more detailed network monitoring data. As shown in previous work [27,28] available bandwidth estimations are a suitable means of monitoring quality of service and controlling end to end delay for the purposes of IPTV admission control. Users IPTV clients request streaming of content items from the selection server.…”
Section: Illustration Of Slime Mould Content Replicationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…ABETs such as Pathload [20], Spruce [34], Assolo [17], Yaz [33], and BART [14] all propose different approaches for available bandwidth estimation. In our experiments we have used the PathChirp [32] ABET, which has performed well in such comparisons, has a publicly available implementation and, as shown in our previous work [27], is suitable, when appropriately parameterized, for use in IPTV admission control schemes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various server selection schemes, including remote-side and edgebased ones are proposed [4,16,29]. The authors of [30] introduce a Multi-user Edge server Selection method based on Particle swarm optimization (MESP).…”
Section: Server Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several server selection algorithms were proposed using ABETs, to provide estimate on the available bandwidth to be used in the server selection process. The available bandwidth of an end to end network path is defined by [5] [6] as "a streaming capacity, that is, the amount of traffic that can be sent along the path without congesting it". The majority of proposed available bandwidth estimation tools are classified into two categories; the Probe Rate Model (PRM) and the Probe Gap Model (PGM) [5].…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%