Service quality assessment of public transport and the implication role of demographic characteristics

Abstract

PurposeThis paper first proposes scales to evaluate customers' perceived service quality in public transport then identify the demographic characteristics factors that may influence customer perceived service quality and as well as to identify any customers' perceptions differences between the subcategories. Design/methodology/approachManager interview and random sampling method were used to survey 288 consumers of buses public transport. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to confirm the scale validity. Thereafter, Structural Equation Modeling, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to asses the causal paths and the service quality perceptions differences among the subgroups. FindingsThe three dimensions of functional, convenience and physical environment quality were confirmed as underlying factors to assess customer perceived quality in public transport setting. Age and owning a driving license are factors that directly and positively affect service quality whereas education was negatively related to perceived quality. In contrast, the relationships between being a car user, gender and perceived quality were not supported. The results also showed that younger commuter appears to have lower perceptions of service quality as compared to adults. However, the current study does suggest that people with university education and above may be a better audience for advertising appeals focusing on one of these three significant dimensions of service quality. Originality/ valueThis study adds theoretical knowledge on how to assess opinions accurately of customers' perception of service quality in public transport services as well as to provide good insight on the direct role of demographic characteristics on customers´ perceived service quality.

Appraising the market for bicycle sharing schemes: Perceived service quality, satisfaction, and behavioural intention in London

“…Quality of service assessments are present across all of the traditional modes of public transport including bus (Eboli and Mazzulla, 2007;Stradling et al 2007;Yaya et al 2014;Mahmoud and Hine, 2016;Morton et al 2016;Grisé and El-Geneidy, 2017), rail (Nathanail, 2008;Chou et al 2014;Eboli and Mazzulla, 2015;Yanik et al 2017), and airline (Fick and Ritchie, 1991;Ostrowski et al 1993;Pakdil and Aydin, 2007) operations. A comprehensive review of the literature in this area is offered by Lierop et al (2017), who investigated the dimensions that have commonly been found to effect the level of satisfaction experienced by public transport passengers and the intention to continue using the service.…”

Intra-Urban Spatial Disparities in User Satisfaction with Public Transport Services

“…This measure is based on qualitative-based scales, either numerical or Likert-based [10,[31][32][33]. As a consequence, most statistical methods used in the subsequent data analysis to model user satisfaction are: (1) those methods which relate an ordinal scale to a continuous variable, including regression analysis [15,34], structural equation systems [35][36][37] and factorial analysis [38,39]; and (2) methods dealing with satisfaction or perception as a discrete variable, such as logit models [40,41] and ordered logit and probit models [8,19,42,43].…”

Public transport usage among university students: what to expect based on customer satisfaction survey (CSS) analysis

“…Together, attribute-performance and attribute-importance help transit managers visualize a global scenario for passengers' customer evaluation (Wang, Feng and Hsieh, 2010), thus, providing useful information to de#ine more effective goals and more pro#itable and assertive investments (Mouwen, 2015). Additionally, once users' needs and preferences are heterogeneous, it is necessary to understand the variety of behaviors to create more adaptable strategies (Yaya et al, 2015;de Oña et al, 2016).…”