2009
DOI: 10.3233/iwa-2009-0194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service Quality between e-Government Users and Administrators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While first two phases do not have much scope for citizen participation, the transaction phase and integration phase can provide a platform for citizen to interact with government officials and express their views on prevailing systems. Sung et al (2009) perform a gap analysis of users' own perception of service quality and government administrators' perception of user perceived service quality which exhibits considerable lacunae between both the percepts. In another study Jones et al (2007) argue that government organizations must include social and management aspects in e-Government evaluation model to improve understanding of e-Government impact.…”
Section: Jeim 253mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While first two phases do not have much scope for citizen participation, the transaction phase and integration phase can provide a platform for citizen to interact with government officials and express their views on prevailing systems. Sung et al (2009) perform a gap analysis of users' own perception of service quality and government administrators' perception of user perceived service quality which exhibits considerable lacunae between both the percepts. In another study Jones et al (2007) argue that government organizations must include social and management aspects in e-Government evaluation model to improve understanding of e-Government impact.…”
Section: Jeim 253mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several specific country studies of e-government service quality using various assessment models. Rotchanakitumnuai (2008) studied Thai taxpayers' perceptions of their experiences filing income tax returns, and Sung et al (2009) examined the quality divide of perceptual differences between the users and administrators of the Taiwan egovernment portal. However, the Sung study was based on the SERVQAL scale, developed for the traditional market environment.…”
Section: Quality Of E-government Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a review of the literature shows that the majority of models that have been developed in e-government service quality were adopted from e-commerce domain (e.g. (Barnes and Vidgen 2003;Jun et al 2009;Papadomichelaki and Mentzas 2009;Sung et al 2009;Bhattacharya et al 2012) ). Although literature review is helpful method to identify possible dimensions and items of e-service quality, the constraint of this method is that it can only identify the current dimensions and items.…”
Section: Phase4: Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these studies are almost exclusively confirmatory (Thompson et al, 2005;Sung et al, 2009;Chen, 2010;Karunasena and Deng, 2012). Since they deal largely with user acceptance and perceived quality, they do not conduct an examination differentiated by service and thus through which innovative services could be identified.…”
Section: E-government In a Theoretic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%