2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting up virgin stress conditions in discrete element models

Abstract: In the present work, a methodology for setting up virgin stress conditions in discrete element models is proposed. The developed algorithm is applicable to discrete or coupled discrete/continuum modeling of underground excavation employing the discrete element method (DEM). Since the DEM works with contact forces rather than stresses there is a need for the conversion of pre-excavation stresses to contact forces for the DEM model. Different possibilities of setting up virgin stress conditions in the DEM model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The displacement field, however, can be determined up to rigid modes. Assuming zero rotations and fixing zero displacements at the particle center x C , we can get the solution for the displacement of an arbitrary point x of the particle as false(upfalse)i=false(ϵpfalse)ij()xjfalse(xCfalse)j or, alternatively, in the matrix notation up=εpfalse(boldxxCfalse), where ε p is the strain matrix εp=[]centerarray(ϵp)11array(ϵp)21array(ϵp)12array(ϵp)22. …”
Section: Formulation Of the Dem With Deformable Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The displacement field, however, can be determined up to rigid modes. Assuming zero rotations and fixing zero displacements at the particle center x C , we can get the solution for the displacement of an arbitrary point x of the particle as false(upfalse)i=false(ϵpfalse)ij()xjfalse(xCfalse)j or, alternatively, in the matrix notation up=εpfalse(boldxxCfalse), where ε p is the strain matrix εp=[]centerarray(ϵp)11array(ϵp)21array(ϵp)12array(ϵp)22. …”
Section: Formulation Of the Dem With Deformable Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Scholtès and Donzé [17] applied an enhanced joint contact logic to represent the pre-existing fractures in the rock. Rojek et al [18] proposed a 2D virgin stress installation method in which an inverse displacement method is firstly used to generate stress-free particle assemblies configuration and then the kinematic loading and stress relaxation are employed to reach the expected virgin stress conditions. Currently it is still difficult to statically generate densely-compacted and stress-free rock sample in 3D.…”
Section: Discrete Element Modeling (Dem) For Seabed Solid Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle stresses σ p are derived by averaging over the particle volumes V p (Figure ) in terms of the contact forces f c acting on each particle using the following formula: bold-italicσp=1Vptruec=1npcboldscboldf1ptc0.1em, where n p c is the number of particles being in contact with the p th particle, s c is the vector connecting the element center with the contact point (see Figure ), f c is the contact force, and the symbol ⊗ denotes the outer (tensor) product. The averaging formula should also include reaction forces and other external surface forces (cf the work of Rojek et al). In the 2D formulation, the stress is represented by the matrix bold-italicσp=[]centerarray(σp)xxarray(σp)xyarray0array(σp)yxarray(σp)yyarray0array0array0array(σp)zz1emfor plane strain or bold-italicσp=[]centerarray(σp)xxarray(σp)xyarray(σp)yx…”
Section: General Framework Of the Ddemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of the deformable discrete element method 10 FIGURE 2 Vectors used in the particle stress evaluation where n p c is the number of particles being in contact with the pth particle, s c is the vector connecting the element center with the contact point (see Figure 2), f c is the contact force, and the symbol ⊗ denotes the outer (tensor) product. The averaging formula (1) should also include reaction forces and other external surface forces (cf the work of Rojek et al 12 ).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%