2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe camptodactyly: A systematic surgeon and therapist collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study also used PIP joint skeletal changes noted on radiograph as a surgical indication (the exact radiographic change was not described). 23…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One study also used PIP joint skeletal changes noted on radiograph as a surgical indication (the exact radiographic change was not described). 23…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies included 7 adult patients, and one study included 22 patients who were not treated; these patients were excluded. Three articles [21][22][23] likely studied overlapping patient populations because they were authored by the same research group with overlapping patient recruitment periods. We included all 3 articles in the qualitative analysis as each had a different aim, so their conclusions still uniquely contributed to the overall understanding of camptodactyly; however, we only included quantitative results from the most recent article of the three 23 when aggregating outcomes data.…”
Section: Study and Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Evans et al 8 involved 31 digits in 22 patients (7 of which were type I, 8 were type II, and 7 were type III), and found no significant improvement in total range of motion of the PIP joint following surgical treatment, with improvement only observed in the extension arc of the digit. However, in the studies by Netscher and Hamilton et al involving 18 patients with type I or II camptodactyly 9 , satisfactory results were achieved with a stepwise surgical release strategy, with 15 patients (83.3%) achieving full active range of motion of the PIP joint. With this approach, successful release can be determined based on passive flexion and extension of the digit during the operation itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Siegert et al [3] reported that more than 50% of patients complained about a loss of flexion after surgery. Additionally, previous studies reported that, to correct camptodactyly, a release of the FDS was usually performed [3][4][5][6][7]12,13,19,20]. However, the excessive lengthening or tenotomy of the FDS gives rise to a decrease in the active arc of motion and a loss of flexion, even if the procedure was able to provide a better extension of the PIP joint [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%