2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1344-6223(03)00045-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex determination from the sternal end of the rib by osteometric analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the logistic regression models revealed that the accuracy for sex determination was 80-85% when only the sternal measurements SA or FRW were used (Table 3). These values are similar to those in the literature [1,3,10]. Model 6 (SA + FRW) had the highest accuracy for sex determination (88.2%) among the models using these sternal measurements together with FRW or using combined SA and FRW (models 3, 4 and 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of the logistic regression models revealed that the accuracy for sex determination was 80-85% when only the sternal measurements SA or FRW were used (Table 3). These values are similar to those in the literature [1,3,10]. Model 6 (SA + FRW) had the highest accuracy for sex determination (88.2%) among the models using these sternal measurements together with FRW or using combined SA and FRW (models 3, 4 and 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A study on the European sternum led to the ''149 rule'', according to which the length of the male sternum exceeds 149 mm in length, whereas the length of the female sternum is less than 149 mm [2]. Different population groups such as American Whites and Blacks have been thought to be the main reason for the different numbers in the rules [9,10]. Some studies have emphasized that the sex determination accuracy can be increased when 4th rib measurements and the rib mineralization pattern are taken into account in addition to sternal data [1,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding sexual dimorphism of individual ribs, some studies have addressed this question from a forensic point of view. Specifically, the width and height of the sternal end of the human fourth rib were proposed as dimorphic in the mid‐80s (Işcan, ), a fact that was later confirmed in different populations (Koçak, Aktas, Ertürk, Aktas, & Yemisçigil, —Turkish population; Macaluso, Rico, Santos, & Lucena, —Spanish population; Meena, Mittal, Chouksey, & Rani, —Indian population; Wiredu, Kumoji, Seshadri, & Biritwum, —Ghana population). Meanwhile, Bellemare et al () quantified the rib length of the third, sixth, and ninth ribs of a Canadian population and found no statistical differences in this measurement between both sexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCormick et al investigated more than 1100 chest plate roentgenograms and reported, that the width of the 4 th costa is more sexually dimorphic than the 2 nd , 3 rd and 5 th costae (Mc Cornick, 1980). In 2003, Kocak et al also confirmed that the sexual dimorphism can be evaluated using the right 4 th costa (Kocak et al, 2003).…”
Section: Di̇scussi̇onmentioning
confidence: 99%