2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63315-2_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Determination of Incomplete Skull of Han Ethnic in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 2 , it can be seen that when selecting a group of suitable parameter values ( s =2, β =0.5, p 1 =0.9, p 2 =0.1, σ 1 =30, and σ 2 =110), the MKDSIF-FCM algorithm can obtain the best classification accuracy of sex determination of the skull. For 186 skulls of the Han Chinese ethnic group, we obtain the accuracy of 95.70% compared to 87.09%, 92.2%, and 93.55% found in the literature [ 15 – 17 ], respectively. There is a classification accuracy of 93.02% for males and 98% for females, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From Table 2 , it can be seen that when selecting a group of suitable parameter values ( s =2, β =0.5, p 1 =0.9, p 2 =0.1, σ 1 =30, and σ 2 =110), the MKDSIF-FCM algorithm can obtain the best classification accuracy of sex determination of the skull. For 186 skulls of the Han Chinese ethnic group, we obtain the accuracy of 95.70% compared to 87.09%, 92.2%, and 93.55% found in the literature [ 15 – 17 ], respectively. There is a classification accuracy of 93.02% for males and 98% for females, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In particular, logistic regression and discriminant function analysis are the two most representative statistical learning methods. According to the method used in literature [ 17 ], we established the best model using logistic regression and stepwise variable selection. When selecting nine variables (I8, I11, I14, I16, I20, I29, I31, I38, I40), the model obtains 84.93% and 92.53% classification rates for males and females, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…erefore, the correct rate is also higher. Liu et al [45] took the frontal bone as the experimental object and used the forward stepwise regression method based on the maximum likelihood estimation to establish the frontal bone sex discrimination model. e accuracy rate of male discrimination was 89.4%, female discrimination was 85.0%, and the average accuracy rate of discrimination was 87.2%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%