2021
DOI: 10.1177/09596518211007294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaking table control via real-time inversion of hydraulic servoactuator linear state-space model

Abstract: In this work, a Model-Based Control method for a single horizontal degree of freedom shaking table is presented. The proposed approach relies on the real-time inversion of a previously identified linear state-space model of the hydraulic servoactuator which drives the table. The inputs to the model are the control command and the force exerted on servoactuator rod. The latter contains all the relevant information related to the external actions acting on the servoactuator, thus making control system performanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure followed to perform the DI is a particularization of the Structure Algorithm to linear systems in which some of the system inputs are known (Kwatny and Blankenship, 2000; Ramírez-Senent et al, 2021). Therefore, the output equation is differentiated with respect to time successively, until the inputs (uc,DI) required for the system to achieve the desired output (Fta,r) can be factored out.…”
Section: Control Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The procedure followed to perform the DI is a particularization of the Structure Algorithm to linear systems in which some of the system inputs are known (Kwatny and Blankenship, 2000; Ramírez-Senent et al, 2021). Therefore, the output equation is differentiated with respect to time successively, until the inputs (uc,DI) required for the system to achieve the desired output (Fta,r) can be factored out.…”
Section: Control Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the application of dynamics inversion (DI) techniques to the force control of a Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) electrodynamic PMA is presented. The DI constitutes a model-based, structured procedure whose aim is to find a PMA system inverse which, upon implementation in the controller, allows for an approximate cancellation of the PMA dynamics (Kwatny and Blankenship, 2000; Ramírez-Senent, et al, 2021). Consequently, a very accurate tracking of the target force output by any VCA is achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shake tables driven by hydraulic actuators directly succeed the intrinsic nonlinear characteristic of the actuators, which are derived from the hydraulic fluid, servo-valves, and friction of cylinders. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Many shake table experiments are performed to observe the damage and failures of structures during earthquake events. 2 The structures on the tables generally show nonlinear characteristics that are equal to or greater than those from the actuation systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the shake table is designed to minimise nonlinear characteristics, some of them remain within the system. Shake tables driven by hydraulic actuators directly succeed the intrinsic nonlinear characteristic of the actuators, which are derived from the hydraulic fluid, servo‐valves, and friction of cylinders 7–12 . Many shake table experiments are performed to observe the damage and failures of structures during earthquake events 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In shake table experiments, nonlinear characteristics within an actuation system and the structure to be examined degrade its control. Shake tables driven by hydraulic actuators exhibit nonlinearity derived from the hydraulic fuid, servo-valves, and friction of cylinders within the actuation system [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Shake table experiments are mainly conducted to observe seismic damage or failures in structures or nonlinear characteristics in earthquake protection devices [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%