2014
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape outlier detection and visualization for functional data: the outliergram

Abstract: We propose a new method to visualize and detect shape outliers in samples of curves. In functional data analysis, we observe curves defined over a given real interval and shape outliers may be defined as those curves that exhibit a different shape from the rest of the sample. Whereas magnitude outliers, that is, curves that lie outside the range of the majority of the data, are in general easy to identify, shape outliers are often masked among the rest of the curves and thus difficult to detect. In this articl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
111
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To tackle the shape outliers, some researchers proposed decomposing the overall functional depth (or outlyingness) into just magnitude and shape depth (or outlyingness) in order to capture the shape outliers more accurately. Examples include the outliergram (Arribas-Gil and Romo, 2014), the functional outlier map (Rousseeuw et al, 2018), the total variation depth (Huang and Sun 2016), and the magnitude-shape plot (Dai and Genton, 2018c). Researchers also defined depth notions Figure 1: Shape outliers can be changed into magnitude outliers through some type of transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle the shape outliers, some researchers proposed decomposing the overall functional depth (or outlyingness) into just magnitude and shape depth (or outlyingness) in order to capture the shape outliers more accurately. Examples include the outliergram (Arribas-Gil and Romo, 2014), the functional outlier map (Rousseeuw et al, 2018), the total variation depth (Huang and Sun 2016), and the magnitude-shape plot (Dai and Genton, 2018c). Researchers also defined depth notions Figure 1: Shape outliers can be changed into magnitude outliers through some type of transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like most moment‐based statistics, the test statistic has breakdown value 0. Outliers for functional data are generally more difficult to detect than for scalar or vector observations (see Arribas‐Gil and Romo, and references therein), so robust approaches can be of value; the ideas of Brys et al could be potentially extended to the functional context or other robust tests developed. We note that it is always useful to complement significance tests by exploratory tools such as normal QQ plots of the scores or other tools described, for example, in Kosiorowski and Zawadzki .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If m = 1 and d = 1, then we recover the band introduced in [11] and given by (1), so that band(f 1 , . .…”
Section: M-bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%