2016
DOI: 10.4103/1687-8574.188910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaping ability of single versus multi file rotary Ni-Ti systems in curved root canals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ProTaper Next rotary system was employed for mechanical preparation to remove pulp tissue, standardize the canal diameter and provide a more predictable preparation form while also increasing procedural efficiency [35,36] . This is because of the offset mass rotation motion, which produces a unique asymmetrical rotary motion and at any given crosssection the file only touches the wall at two points; which gives the advantage of reducing the taper lock and the file has more cross-sectional space for better cutting and loading debris [37] . Apical preparation was completed with an X4 file as a master apical file, which is equivalent to size #40 ISO, to achieve proper preparation because the surface area of the canal left untouched was 35%-50% with large apical preparations (minimum ISO #40) and preparations less than file #40, which leave much more unprepared dentin [38] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ProTaper Next rotary system was employed for mechanical preparation to remove pulp tissue, standardize the canal diameter and provide a more predictable preparation form while also increasing procedural efficiency [35,36] . This is because of the offset mass rotation motion, which produces a unique asymmetrical rotary motion and at any given crosssection the file only touches the wall at two points; which gives the advantage of reducing the taper lock and the file has more cross-sectional space for better cutting and loading debris [37] . Apical preparation was completed with an X4 file as a master apical file, which is equivalent to size #40 ISO, to achieve proper preparation because the surface area of the canal left untouched was 35%-50% with large apical preparations (minimum ISO #40) and preparations less than file #40, which leave much more unprepared dentin [38] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%