2014
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharpening the focus on causes and timing of readmission after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Readmissions after radical cystectomy are common, burdensome, and poorly understood. For these reasons, the authors conducted a population-based study that focused on the causes of and time to readmission after radical cystectomy. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, at total of 1782 patients who underwent radical cystectomy from 2003 through 2009 were identified. A piecewise exponential model was used to examine reasons for readmission as well as patient and cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ninety-day mortality was seen at a significantly higher rate in the LACE high-risk group (9.1 vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001), and the LACE score predicted an adjusted odds of 2.09 for morality with a reasonable predictive value (AUC of 0.7181). The overall 90-day re-admission rate was 18.4%, and consistent with reported rates in the literature (16-25%) [2,3,4,5,6]. Higher readmission rates were seen in high-risk patients as identified by LACE score (22.8 vs. 17.7%, p = 0.002), and while uni-variate analysis demonstrated a strong relationship with high-risk designation and readmission, adjusted multi-variate analysis demonstrated only a borderline increase in risk with poor predictive value for 90-day readmission (AUC = 0.5812).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ninety-day mortality was seen at a significantly higher rate in the LACE high-risk group (9.1 vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001), and the LACE score predicted an adjusted odds of 2.09 for morality with a reasonable predictive value (AUC of 0.7181). The overall 90-day re-admission rate was 18.4%, and consistent with reported rates in the literature (16-25%) [2,3,4,5,6]. Higher readmission rates were seen in high-risk patients as identified by LACE score (22.8 vs. 17.7%, p = 0.002), and while uni-variate analysis demonstrated a strong relationship with high-risk designation and readmission, adjusted multi-variate analysis demonstrated only a borderline increase in risk with poor predictive value for 90-day readmission (AUC = 0.5812).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In addition to having the longest postoperative length of stay of all urological procedures, radical cystectomies also have the highest 90-day readmission rate (16-25%) [2,3,4,5,6] and 90-day mortality rate (3.7- 10.6%) [2,7,8]. Over 65% of these readmissions occur within 10-12 days of discharge, suggesting that detailed discharge planning and close outpatient follow-up are warranted [3,4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We confirmed the morbidity revealing a 22.8% readmission, 55.2% complication, and 2.3% in-hospital mortality rate, which is similar to other published series. [7][8][9]13,14 We also revealed that treatment at higher-volume centres or academic centres was not protective or predictive of readmission. Academic centres were less likely to discharge patients to PACFs, which may be protective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This allows the model to capture not only the time to readmission, but also different time to readmission dynamics for different causes of readmission. This could potentially help clinicians better target diagnostic questioning and tests to look for specific readmission causing conditions at different times after discharge; an idea which is supported by the clinical literature (see Hu et al (2014)). Assuming that the vector of frailties ν is drawn from a multivariate distribution with density g(ν 1 , ..., ν M ) and t i for i = 1, .…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 95%