2011
DOI: 10.3354/meps08979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shellfish and seaweed mariculture increase atmospheric CO2 absorption by coastal ecosystems

Abstract: With an annual production of >10 million t (Mt), China is the largest producer of cultivated shellfish and seaweeds in the world. Through mariculture of shellfish and seaweeds, it is estimated that 3.79 ± 0.37 Mt C yr -1 are being taken up, and 1.20 ± 0.11 Mt C yr -1 are being removed from the coastal ecosystem by harvesting (means ± SD). These estimates are based on carbon content data of both shellfish and seaweeds and annual production data from 1999 to 2008. The result illustrates that cultivated shellfish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Highest carbon removal rates in the current study were 8.00 and 10.94 g C m -2 d -1 for Effluent 1 and 2, respectively, similar to 11 g C removal m -2 d -1 by Gracilaria vermiculophylla in effluent of turbot, sea bass, and Senegalese sole aquaculture (Abreu et al 2011). Marine algal species in cultivation have tissue carbon contents ranging from 20 to 41% DW (Kim et al 2008, Tang et al 2011, lower than that of P. palmata integrated with halibut. In samples of P. palmata from the wild, tissue carbon contents were 40 to 43% DW during summer (13.5-20°C) and 43 to 45% DW during winter (12-16°C) (Martínez and Rico 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Highest carbon removal rates in the current study were 8.00 and 10.94 g C m -2 d -1 for Effluent 1 and 2, respectively, similar to 11 g C removal m -2 d -1 by Gracilaria vermiculophylla in effluent of turbot, sea bass, and Senegalese sole aquaculture (Abreu et al 2011). Marine algal species in cultivation have tissue carbon contents ranging from 20 to 41% DW (Kim et al 2008, Tang et al 2011, lower than that of P. palmata integrated with halibut. In samples of P. palmata from the wild, tissue carbon contents were 40 to 43% DW during summer (13.5-20°C) and 43 to 45% DW during winter (12-16°C) (Martínez and Rico 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In 2007, seaweed mariculture reached 1.4 million t in China, representing an estimated 0.34 million t of carbon removed from the marine coastal environment by seaweed harvesting (Tang et al 2011). Investigating carbon dioxide fixation by microalgae in a photobioreactor, Otsuki (2001) found carbon removal rates of 13.75 g C m -2 d -1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seaweeds can transform DIC via photosynthesis, thereby decreasing the pCO 2 in seawater. By removing a significant amount of carbon from the ocean at harvest time (Tang et al 2011), these life forms provide potential tools for biomass production as well as CO 2 sequestration (Duarte et al 2005). In addition, seaweeds acting as CO 2 sinks can sequester carbon within their biomass throughout their life spans (Chung et al 2013) and beyond (Delille et al 2009;Trevathan-Tackett et al 2015).…”
Section: Seaweeds and Sabs Capabilities In Co 2 Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seaweeds utilize inorganic carbon dissolved in seawater as free CO 2 that diffuses in through cellular membranes from the surrounding seawater (Turan and Neori 2011) and as bicarbonate that is actively pumped into the cell via a carbon concentrating mechanism (Giordano et al 2005;Raven et al 2008). Moreover, the transformation by seaweeds of DIC into organic carbon by photosynthesis can decrease the pCO 2 in seawater (Tang et al 2011). Through these processes the carbon sequestration in seaweed biomass can be considered as a potential mitigation measure against an increase in atmospheric CO 2 (Chung et al 2011;N'Yeurt et al 2012;Chung et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecologically, the damage of the mussel population will eliminate the role of mussel to absorb harmful pollutants such as Pb and Cd or atmospheric CO 2 which can induce acidification of marine habitat. It is recognized that mussel is not only a beneficial filter feeder animal, but also one of the good carbon sink marine animals [49] by flocculating marine organic particles that enter their body and excrete them as pseudo feces in marine sediment. Economically, the depletion of the mussel population will decrease income of artisanal fishermen livelihood of which depends on the population of marine organisms such as green mussel.…”
Section: Byssusmentioning
confidence: 99%