2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gl069095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shift of the magnetopause reconnection line to the winter hemisphere under southward IMF conditions: Geotail and MMS observations

Abstract: At 02:13 UT on 18 November 2015 when the geomagnetic dipole was tilted by −27°, the MMS spacecraft observed southward reconnection jets near the subsolar magnetopause under southward and dawnward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. Based on four‐spacecraft estimations of the magnetic field direction near the separatrix and the motion and direction of the current sheet, the location of the reconnection line was estimated to be ~1.8 RE or further northward of MMS. The Geotail spacecraft at GSM Z~1.4 RE als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that, in principle, L can be estimated as [ Nakamura et al , ], L=(T2T1)VMPVin·Vc1Vc2Vc2Vc1, for the electron velocity cutoff, as well as the VFE acting on magnetospheric ions in the magnetosheath boundary layer (MSBL) [ Nakamura et al , , ] and magnetosheath ions in the LLBL [ Kitamura et al , ]. However, as V c1 and V c2 become much larger than the ion velocities, L becomes sensitive to variations in the magnetopause boundary speed V MP and inflow speed V in .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that, in principle, L can be estimated as [ Nakamura et al , ], L=(T2T1)VMPVin·Vc1Vc2Vc2Vc1, for the electron velocity cutoff, as well as the VFE acting on magnetospheric ions in the magnetosheath boundary layer (MSBL) [ Nakamura et al , , ] and magnetosheath ions in the LLBL [ Kitamura et al , ]. However, as V c1 and V c2 become much larger than the ion velocities, L becomes sensitive to variations in the magnetopause boundary speed V MP and inflow speed V in .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure c, ions accelerated and heated by the reconnection are seen in association with an enhancement of ion velocity in the L direction. The increase in the low‐energy cutoff from 14:59:30 to 15:01:15 UT in the ion energy spectrum is due to the velocity filter effect (VFE) [ Nakamura et al , ] applying to ions originating from the magnetosheath in the Lower Latitude Boundary Layer (LLBL) [e.g., Kitamura et al , ]. Cold ions were also detected between 14:59:55 and 15:01:15 UT, as they were accelerated by the reconnection into the energy range detected by ESA [ McFadden et al , ].…”
Section: The 22 November 2011 Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the dipole tilt angle is positive, the North Pole tilts toward the Sun, so the northern hemisphere is summer and the southern hemisphere is winter. The X-line location under finite dipole tilt was investigated in some modeling studies (e.g., Komar et al, 2015;Park et al, 2006;Russell et al, 2003) and observational studies (e.g., Kitamura et al, 2016;Trattner et al, 2012;Trenchi et al, 2008;Zhu et al, 2015), which suggested that the X-line shifts toward the winter hemisphere. Trenchi et al (2008) conducted a statistical analysis of the X-line location, based on 13 months of Double Star TC 1 observations on the dayside low-latitude magnetopause.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the return beam form the ionosphere actually disappeared makes a much closer final distance to the component reconnection X‐line more likely. In another study for the GEM kinetic challenge effort, analyzing the same event, Kitamura et al (2016) estimated the distance to the extended X‐line crossing the dayside magnetopause to be about 2 R E based on MMS and Geotail observations. Given the uncertainties in calculating the distance of the reconnection site from the low‐velocity cutoff method, the estimated distances are not inconsistent with the estimation from Kitamura et al (2016), and both results agree with the location of the X‐line being northward of MMS.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a contribution to the “Geospace Environment Modelling (GEM) dayside kinetic challenge.” This challenge brings together various satellite observations, simulations, and models to study and compare their results for a single, preselected magnetopause crossing event. For this challenge, an interval was selected with steady solar wind and southward IMF conditions that occurred during an MMS magnetopause crossing on 18 November 2015, previously analyzed in Kitamura et al (2016). The study presented here focuses primarily on the observations from the MMS Hot Plasma Composition Analyzer (HPCA) instruments and uses observations from other instruments on MMS and from solar wind monitors for context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%