2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35275-1_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifted Laplacian RAS Solvers for the Helmholtz Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also a few results on overlapping domain decomposition methods e.g. [41], [30], [31], with the latter explicitly using absorption; these demonstrated the potential of the methods analysed in this paper. Finally, we note that [44] introduces a new sweeping-style method for the Helmholtz equation, and also contains a good literature review of both domain-decomposition and sweeping-style methods.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are also a few results on overlapping domain decomposition methods e.g. [41], [30], [31], with the latter explicitly using absorption; these demonstrated the potential of the methods analysed in this paper. Finally, we note that [44] introduces a new sweeping-style method for the Helmholtz equation, and also contains a good literature review of both domain-decomposition and sweeping-style methods.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The second variant is the Restrictive Additive Schwarz (RAS) preconditioner, which is well-known in the literature [3], [31]. Here to define the local operator, for each j ∈ I h , choose a single ℓ = ℓ(j) with the property that x j ∈ Ω ℓ(j) .…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other uses of the shifted Laplacian preconditioner include its use with ε ∼ k 2 in the context of domain decomposition methods in [30], and its use with ε ∼ k in the sweeping preconditioner of Enquist and Ying in [13] (these authors consider preconditioning the Helmholtz equation with k replaced by k + iδ with δ ∼ 1, and this corresponds to choosing ε ∼ k). Finally we note that solving the problem with absorption by preconditioning with the inverse of the Laplacian (i.e., aiming to achieve (P2) with ε = 0) has been investigated in [24,25].…”
Section: Previous Work On the Shifted Laplacian Preconditionermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One advantage of DD over multigrid in this context is that "wave-based" components such as impedance or PML boundary conditions on the subdomains can more-easily be incorporated into DD preconditioners (see §1.5 below). The numerical experiments in [41] and [42] (following earlier experiments in [52] and [53]) show that additive Schwarz DD preconditioners for A can perform well for k ξ k 2 if impedance boundary conditions are used on the subdomain problems, instead of Dirichlet ones, and these experiments are backed up by analysis in [43] that shows that Property (ii) can be satisfied in some situations with |ξ| ∼ k 1+β for β small. 1.4.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 85%