2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shrub fuel characteristics estimated from overstory variables in NW Spain pine stands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This general trend is consistent with other studies, reporting that the maximum shrub development was also limited by overstory variables such as basal area (G -Coll et al 2011, Castedo-Dorado et al 2012). Thus G serves as an indicator of stand competition, and has the advantage of being relatively simple to obtain in the field or to be inferred from growth and yield models (Castedo-Dorado et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This general trend is consistent with other studies, reporting that the maximum shrub development was also limited by overstory variables such as basal area (G -Coll et al 2011, Castedo-Dorado et al 2012). Thus G serves as an indicator of stand competition, and has the advantage of being relatively simple to obtain in the field or to be inferred from growth and yield models (Castedo-Dorado et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Canopy cover, i.e., the proportion of the forest floor covered by the vertical projection of the tree crowns, is suitable for describing stand-level microclimate and can easily be estimated, thus, most forest inventories record it routinely [32,33]. Canopy and shrub covers are expected to be correlated in forest stands [34]. The soil and physiographic variables were: texture, content of organic matter, rockiness, slope, altitude, and aspect.…”
Section: Species Data Set and Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed classes were a generalization of the schema proposed by Fernandes (2009), where fire risk (characterized by variables as propagation, intensity or crown fire potential) was related to forest structure, defined by tree density and height. In the same direction is the work developed by Castedo et al (2012), which shows that, in general and also in particular for maritime pine in Galicia, the higher the tree density, the lower the above ground fuel load (due to the shadowing effect of the trees on the understory), and therefore the fuel model would lead to wildfires of a lower magnitude. With respect to the height of the forest stand, in general, the higher the trees, the lower the probability of a fire reaching the crowns and propagating through them, increasing the magnitude of the wildfire, as Gómez-Vázquez et al (2014) found for maritime pine.…”
Section: Classification Of the Forest Stands Regarding The Magnitude mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…When applying the proposed methodology, it should be taken into account that, although the threshold values chosen to define the magnitude of the wildfires are coherent with the fire behaviour models that were set as a reference (Fernandes 2009;Castedo et al, 2012) and that they have been considered to be suitable for the study area, a different choice would have led to different results. The difficulty of setting these values lays in the fact that the fire behaviour models we used do not specify what is considered to be a dense or a tall stand, and therefore the user has to establish these values arbitrarily.…”
Section: Identification Of the Forested Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%