2015
DOI: 10.1002/xrs.2653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signatures of different carbon bonds in graphene oxide from soft x-ray reflectometry

Abstract: In graphene oxide, the graphite lattice is intercalated with oxygen groups that bond to carbon atoms. These groups have a bearing on the possibility of using graphene oxide as a precursor to make graphene. The nature of carbon bonds in graphene oxide has been characterized with soft x‐ray reflection spectroscopy across the carbon K‐edge. Results distinguish graphene oxide synthesized with Hummers' method from that made using a method suggested by Tour. The observed spectra are consistent with those from near‐e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the integration of combined oxidized carbon and that of graphitic carbon (both sp 2 and sp 3 carbons) gives a ratio of oxidized to nonoxidized carbon species of approximately 1.6; that is, 60% of the carbon is in a oxidized form (in agreement with the overall O/C ratio of 0.6 derived from the survey spectra), which is similar to the reported degree of oxidation by other methods [35]. Near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) measurements were also recently employed to compare the properties of graphene oxide produced by Hummers' and Tour methods, indicaing a higher incidence of C-OH and C=O functional groups in the material prepared by Tours' method [41].…”
Section: Characterization Of Mth-go and Liet 3 Bh-rgosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Overall, the integration of combined oxidized carbon and that of graphitic carbon (both sp 2 and sp 3 carbons) gives a ratio of oxidized to nonoxidized carbon species of approximately 1.6; that is, 60% of the carbon is in a oxidized form (in agreement with the overall O/C ratio of 0.6 derived from the survey spectra), which is similar to the reported degree of oxidation by other methods [35]. Near edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) measurements were also recently employed to compare the properties of graphene oxide produced by Hummers' and Tour methods, indicaing a higher incidence of C-OH and C=O functional groups in the material prepared by Tours' method [41].…”
Section: Characterization Of Mth-go and Liet 3 Bh-rgosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The special properties of nanoscale carbon nanomaterials make them ideal choices for modern electronic, , energy storage, and sensing applications . In particular, graphene has great potential for energy storage, micro and nano-electronics, semiconductor industry devices, and biotechnology applications. Graphene was the first identified 2D material and comprises a single 2D atomic layer carbon arranged in a honeycomb lattice. , Graphene possesses fast electronic mobility, excellent electrical conductivity, good inherent strength, and high optical transparency …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10−15 Graphene was the first identified 2D material 16 and comprises a single 2D atomic layer carbon arranged in a honeycomb lattice. 17,18 Graphene possesses fast electronic mobility, excellent electrical conductivity, good inherent strength, and high optical transparency. 19 Because of innovations in fabrication methods, it is now possible to integrate synthesis and patterning processes.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the X-ray diffractograms in Figure 5, the peaks present belong to the Miller indices of 002 at 26 • , 100 at 42 • , 101 at 44 • , and 004 at 54 • of the graphene in the case of all samples. The characteristic graphene oxide peak around 12 • is not visible, because the samples are only oxidized to a relatively small extent, even after the reaction with nitric acid [42,43]. Almost no difference was shown between the X-ray patterns, the calculated 002 interlayer distance was about 0.335 nm for all samples, which indicates that mostly the surface functional groups of the samples were affected by the utilized thermal reducing and chemical oxidizing treatments.…”
Section: Xrdmentioning
confidence: 90%