2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019ja027037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Signatures of Nonideal Plasma Evolution During Substorms Obtained by Mining Multimission Magnetometer Data

Abstract: Substorm-type evolution of the Earth's magnetosphere is investigated by mining more than two decades of spaceborne magnetometer data from multiple missions including the first two years (2016)(2017) of the Magnetospheric MultiScale mission. This investigation reveals interesting features of plasma evolution distinct from ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) behavior: X-lines, thin current sheets, and regions with the tailward gradient of the equatorial magnetic field B z . X-lines are found to form mainly beyond … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
108
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(234 reference statements)
11
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that such a data-mining (DM) method resolves the formation of embedded TCSs in the growth phase of substorms and their decay after the substorm onset. It also resolves the formation of the near-Earth X-lines during substorms [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that such a data-mining (DM) method resolves the formation of embedded TCSs in the growth phase of substorms and their decay after the substorm onset. It also resolves the formation of the near-Earth X-lines during substorms [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Since the resulting magnetic field geometry is determined by the instantaneous KNN swarm of virtual probes, its time resolution is largely determined by the global parameter cadence. This is seen, for instance, from rapid substorm dipolarizations reproduced by the KNN method in [27] (Fig. 8i), when the B z field increases from 3 to 10 nT in 5 min over a significant part of the magnetotail.…”
Section: Data Mining Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the model results shown in Figure 3a, reconnection should have been occurring at and around the earthward edge of the Bz = 0 contour line, which we have highlighted with blue “X”s. A magnetic flux rope structure (see Sitnov et al., 2019) formed within the Bz = 0 contour of the reconstructed field. Furthermore, Figures 3b–3d show magnetic field lines projected onto three radial planes: one going through the MMS location (Figure 3c) and one at ±0.5 RE in azimuth on either side of MMS (Figures 3b and 3d).…”
Section: Data Observations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Note observationally L < 10 ρ with ρ calculated through B lobe is typical of the thinnest magnetotail current sheets. Thin current sheets are generally embedded into much broader plasma sheet (Petrukovich et al., 2011; Runov et al., 2006; V. A. Sergeev et al., 1993; Sitnov, Stephens, et al., 2019), and magnetic field magnitude at the thin current sheet boundary is about ∼ B lobe /3 (Petrukovich et al., 2015). The ratio L/ρBlobe2 recalculated with magnetic field at the thin current sheet boundary (instead of B lobe ) would be a factor of ∼10 smaller, that is L / ρ ∼ 10 with B lobe (used through the study) corresponds to a current sheet thickness of about one ion Larmor radius with actual magnetic field magnitude ∼ B lobe /3 (see details in, e.g., Artemyev et al., 2010).…”
Section: Statistical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%