International Test Conference 1999. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37034)
DOI: 10.1109/test.1999.805821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silicon debug: scan chains alone are not enough

Abstract: I For today's multi-million transistor designs, existing design verijication techniques cannot guarantee that first silicon 1 is designed error free. Therefore, techniques ate necessary to eflciently debug firstsilicon. In this article, we present a methodology for debugging multiple clock domain systems-on-a-chip. In addition to scan chains, a set of Design-for-Debug modules is 1 designed into an IC to make it debuggable. bebugger tool sofhvare interacts with the on-chip DjD to make the debug features availab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these arrangements c is number of the trace-register that can be embedded into trace data, m is the number of hardwareassertion inside each cluster and s is the number of the clusters. For example, in our test case, AMBA 3 AXI Bus protocol all these configuration are valid: (2,3,28), (1,4,22), (1,5,17), (1,6,15) , (1,8,11), (1,9,10), (1,14,9), (1,15,7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In these arrangements c is number of the trace-register that can be embedded into trace data, m is the number of hardwareassertion inside each cluster and s is the number of the clusters. For example, in our test case, AMBA 3 AXI Bus protocol all these configuration are valid: (2,3,28), (1,4,22), (1,5,17), (1,6,15) , (1,8,11), (1,9,10), (1,14,9), (1,15,7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For energy consumption, configuration (1,8,11) is the best. (2,3,28) 28.70 0.21 (1,4,22) 28.50 0.21 (1,5,17) 28.42 0.20 (1,6,15) 28.11 0.20 (1,7,13) 28.02 0.18 (1,8,11) 28.20 0.17 (1,9,10) 28.32 0.20 (1,14,9) 28.40 0.21 (1,15,7) 28.70 0.22 No clustering 29.01 0.32…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations