2016
DOI: 10.1002/bip.22993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Silk scaffolds connected with different naturally occurring biomaterials for prostate cancer cell cultivation in 3D

Abstract: In the present work, different biopolymer blend scaffolds based on the silk protein fibroin from Bombyx mori (BM) were prepared via freeze-drying method. The chemical, structural, and mechanical properties of the three dimensional (3D) porous silk fibroin (SF) composite scaffolds of gelatin, collagen, and chitosan as well as SF from Antheraea pernyi (AP) and the recombinant spider silk protein spidroin (SSP1) have been systematically investigated, followed by cell culture experiments with epithelial prostate c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D porous scaffolds also promote the formation of bigger spheroids, compared to non-porous scaffolds, and enhance tumor cell invasion and therapeutic resistance [83,84]. Although they are synthesized mainly by polymers such as poly(ε-caprolactone), porous microparticles can consist of different substances, including natural (e.g., chitosan, hyaluronic acid, alginate, collagen, gelatin, silk fibroin), and synthetic (e.g., poly(lactide-co-glycolide)) materials [85][86][87][88][89][90]. The porosity and pore size of the scaffold are essential for the establishment of effective 3D models, as they can affect the transport of oxygen, metabolites and nutrients, as well as cell adhesion and cell growth [91].…”
Section: Scaffold-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D porous scaffolds also promote the formation of bigger spheroids, compared to non-porous scaffolds, and enhance tumor cell invasion and therapeutic resistance [83,84]. Although they are synthesized mainly by polymers such as poly(ε-caprolactone), porous microparticles can consist of different substances, including natural (e.g., chitosan, hyaluronic acid, alginate, collagen, gelatin, silk fibroin), and synthetic (e.g., poly(lactide-co-glycolide)) materials [85][86][87][88][89][90]. The porosity and pore size of the scaffold are essential for the establishment of effective 3D models, as they can affect the transport of oxygen, metabolites and nutrients, as well as cell adhesion and cell growth [91].…”
Section: Scaffold-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the cell microenvironment has to mimic in vivo physiological conditions including spatial and temporal dimensions and dynamics, physical interactions, such as cell–cell contact, and the cell–extracellular matrix . Several technologies are currently available to produce such microtissues with good control of the dimensions and that exhibit tissue‐like phenotypes including porous scaffolds and polymers, hydrogels and ultralow attachment cell culture plates . These methods take advantage of the natural self‐assembly tendency that is typical of several cell types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, SF/Cs (1: 1) was proven to be a potential biomaterial for generating scaffolds for cancer therapy [ 23 ]. Coincidentally, a recent study suggested that the SF/Cs (1: 1) scaffolds can improve cell growth as a 3D cell culture platform for prostate cancer research compared with matrices based on pure biomaterials or synthetic polymers [ 24 ]. However, the results from our preliminary experiment have shown that the SF/Cs (1: 1) scaffold has poor water absorption as well as low degradation and cell adhesion rates, thereby restricting their applications in the 3D cell culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%