2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SIMILAR – Systematic iterative multilayer literature review method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to other reviews that have been carried out [17,18], instead of following a strict keyword selection strategy to select the relevant literature, we followed an exploratory strategy, employing a critical review approach. Critical reviews rarely aim to perform a comprehensive search of all of the relevant literature [19]. Instead, this review approach intended to synthesize and critically analyze the literature on a broad topic, highlighting inconsistencies [19,20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly to other reviews that have been carried out [17,18], instead of following a strict keyword selection strategy to select the relevant literature, we followed an exploratory strategy, employing a critical review approach. Critical reviews rarely aim to perform a comprehensive search of all of the relevant literature [19]. Instead, this review approach intended to synthesize and critically analyze the literature on a broad topic, highlighting inconsistencies [19,20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical reviews rarely aim to perform a comprehensive search of all of the relevant literature [19]. Instead, this review approach intended to synthesize and critically analyze the literature on a broad topic, highlighting inconsistencies [19,20]. Since the aims of the research were to identify recommended practices promoting biodiversity in agriculture, provide an informative resource, and reveal areas requiring further research, a critical review was considered the most suitable method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve this objective, the mixed method literature review has been selected. Unlike other methods of literature review, such as summarization of prior knowledge (narrative review or descriptive review, for example), explanation (theoretical review or realistic review, for example), data aggregation or integration (meta-analysis or qualitative systematic review, for example), or critical assessment of literature (critical review) that have specific approaches (from a single qualitative or quantitative viewpoint), the mixed method integrates quantitative and qualitative approaches in the same research study [20][21][22]. Mixed methods aim to maximize the strengths and minimize the weaknesses of both qualitative and quantitative methods [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tinjauan literatur sistematis adalah metodologi khusus yang mengidentifikasi, menilai, dan menginterpretasi temuan-temuan suatu topik penelitian sebelumnya dengan mensintesis data dan melaporkan bukti untuk memungkinkan kesimpulan yang cukup jelas tentang apa yang diketahui dan apa yang tidak (González-Betancor & Dorta-González, 2019;Wahono, 2015). Sementara itu, menurut Kosztyán et al (2021) tinjauan literatur sistematis dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif bertujuan untuk mengumpulkan, menginvestigasi, dan menganalisis literatur yang ada serta data numerik yang mendeskripsikan frekuensi dari topik riset atau metode penelitian yang digunakan. Pada Gambar 1 ditunjukan proses pengumpulan data dengan tinjauan literatur sistematis.…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified