1980
DOI: 10.1128/aem.40.5.912-916.1980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple method for concentration of bacteria from large volumes of tap water

Abstract: Membrane adsorption-elution techniques have made it possible to concentrate and detect small numbers of viruses in large volumes of water and wastewater, but no such methods are available for quantitative recovery of bacteria. A number of waterborne disease outbreaks of "unknown etiology" in the United States are suspected to have been caused by pathogens present in numbers too small to be detected by currently available methodology. The present study reports on the use of positively charged depth filters for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Filtration through porous, positively charged material ensures that bacteria reach the charged source more quickly than by electrostatic attraction alone. Goyal & Gerber (1980) showed that electropositively charged filters with large pore size could facilitate the concentration of bacteria from large volumes of water. Hirsh & Martin (1984) and Kroll (1985) realized the potential of such filters for the quality assessment of foods and beverages and succeeded in recovering bacteria from products that are notoriously difficult to filter through conventional membrane filters without injurious treatments, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtration through porous, positively charged material ensures that bacteria reach the charged source more quickly than by electrostatic attraction alone. Goyal & Gerber (1980) showed that electropositively charged filters with large pore size could facilitate the concentration of bacteria from large volumes of water. Hirsh & Martin (1984) and Kroll (1985) realized the potential of such filters for the quality assessment of foods and beverages and succeeded in recovering bacteria from products that are notoriously difficult to filter through conventional membrane filters without injurious treatments, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glass wool filters were eluted in the direction opposite to the original flow with two 80 ml elutions of 3 % beef extract-glycine buffer (BEG) at pH 9.5 (Goyal and Gerba 1980). The first eluent was allowed to soak the filter for 15 min before adding the second eluent, which was immediately pushed through the filter by air.…”
Section: Filter Elution and Flocculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bovine enteric viruses in particular have been suggested to identify animal sources of fecal pollution (Ley et al 2002;Bofill-Mas et al 2011). Most studies in this area have been directed at the concentration of human enteric viruses from water (Ikner et al 2012), or separate strategies for concentrating bacteria (Goyal and Gerba 1980;Bisha et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membrane-adsorption-elution technique has been used to concentrate Escherichia coli and Salmonella organisms from large volumes of potable water (Goyal & Gerba 1980). This technique consists of passing large volumes of test water through positively charged filters (Zeta-plus; AMF-Cuno, Meriden, Conn.) followed by the elution of bacteria adsorbed to the filters in a small volume of an elucnt such as tryptose phosphate broth or beef-extract solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique consists of passing large volumes of test water through positively charged filters (Zeta-plus; AMF-Cuno, Meriden, Conn.) followed by the elution of bacteria adsorbed to the filters in a small volume of an elucnt such as tryptose phosphate broth or beef-extract solution. Using this technique, Goyal & Gerba (1980) were able to recover 30-36% of bacteria from 20-1 volumes of tapwater with 400-fold reduction in volume. Mathewson, Keswick & Dupont ) e\;iliiated several meml"ir;uie lilters for the concentration of Campylohacter jejuni from water and found that the Zeta-plus filter was significantly better than the Millipore HA and the (lelnian (iN(> mieroporoiis lilters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%