Multiple Criteria Decision Making 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2666-6_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulated Annealing for Multi Objective Optimization Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
77
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to guarantee that a dispersed set of efficient solutions is obtained, several techniques have been proposed; these can be classified into one of two main groups: Methods that aggregate the objective functions and dynamically modify the search direction during the search process or within several runs [3,6,7,9,10,19,23], and methods that are based on a Paretolike dominance relation as an acceptance criterion in the search to distinguish between candidate solutions [24,13]; this second type of methods avoid the aggregation of objectives. Recently, empirical evidence was gathered suggesting that methods belonging to the first group perform particularly well [10], the main reason being that local search algorithms can deal more easily with aggregated objective functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to guarantee that a dispersed set of efficient solutions is obtained, several techniques have been proposed; these can be classified into one of two main groups: Methods that aggregate the objective functions and dynamically modify the search direction during the search process or within several runs [3,6,7,9,10,19,23], and methods that are based on a Paretolike dominance relation as an acceptance criterion in the search to distinguish between candidate solutions [24,13]; this second type of methods avoid the aggregation of objectives. Recently, empirical evidence was gathered suggesting that methods belonging to the first group perform particularly well [10], the main reason being that local search algorithms can deal more easily with aggregated objective functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, [24] has extended simulating annealing algorithm, [13] did the same for tabu search algorithm and [2,22] extended the steepest descent algorithm to its multi-objective version. Moreover, one field that has been very active during the last two decades is the evolutionary multi-objective optimisation (EMO).…”
Section: Multi-objective Local Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They usually use several runs of single-objective SA algorithms, and mainly differ by the acceptance rules of new solutions. The first SA for multi-objective algorithm, proposed by Serafini [59], uses the following acceptance criterion. If the new solution dominates the current one, this new solution is accepted to replace the current one.…”
Section: Scalarization-based Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%