2013
DOI: 10.1057/jos.2013.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation metamodelling with Bayesian networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, using the identified discretization intervals for variables X 1 1 , X 1 2 , X1 1 , X1 2 , function MD maps these variables to the relevant discretised input vactor of step 2 (u = 1, 2): MD (X 1 u ) = RC u , MD ( X1 u ) = RV u . We can now estimate the conditional probabilities by using maximum likelihood estimators (see page 299 Pousi et al, 2013) as follows:…”
Section: Step 3: Building Bayesian Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, using the identified discretization intervals for variables X 1 1 , X 1 2 , X1 1 , X1 2 , function MD maps these variables to the relevant discretised input vactor of step 2 (u = 1, 2): MD (X 1 u ) = RC u , MD ( X1 u ) = RV u . We can now estimate the conditional probabilities by using maximum likelihood estimators (see page 299 Pousi et al, 2013) as follows:…”
Section: Step 3: Building Bayesian Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper, therefore, deploys a meta-modeling approach rather than modeling the real system such that the inputs and the outputs of the system are used to learn its behavior. This approach has been effectively applied in several engineering domains (Fienen et al, 2016;Pousi et al, 2013). Dikmen et al (2020) adopted a similar meta-modeling approach to capture associations IJPPM 71,1 among project complexity, uncertainty and performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the input variables, the relative frequencies in the simulation data do not necessarily reflect the actual probability distributions in question because they can be modified as part of the design of experiment step in order to collect a broader set of data. The probability distributions of the input variables are adjusted after the construction of the DBN metamodel in order to represent input certainty (Pousi et al, 2013). The distributions can be modified only after validating the metamodel, because the adjusted distributions for the inputs are not consistent with the validation data.…”
Section: Construction Of Dbn Metamodelsmentioning
confidence: 99%