2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation modelling to estimate the herd-sensitivity of various pool sizes to test beef herds for Johne's disease in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used pooled fecal DNA extracts, since testing every individual pat sample in a herd was beyond the scope of this study. Pooling is recognized as an efficient and cost-effective method when screening cattle herds for pathogens (41,42,82). Where identification of carriage by individual animals or samples is not required in a first screen, pooling can maintain sensitivity at the herd level, dependant on the expected prevalence (42,83).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used pooled fecal DNA extracts, since testing every individual pat sample in a herd was beyond the scope of this study. Pooling is recognized as an efficient and cost-effective method when screening cattle herds for pathogens (41,42,82). Where identification of carriage by individual animals or samples is not required in a first screen, pooling can maintain sensitivity at the herd level, dependant on the expected prevalence (42,83).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a pooling methodology (41,42) to determine herd status for intI1, intI2, and intI3. In the current study, for each herd, pools comprising five individual fecal DNA extracts were mixed as 10 µl aliquots of each individual extract, to form a 50 µl pool, on ice.…”
Section: Dna Preparation and Sample Poolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used pooled fecal DNA extracts, since testing every individual pat sample in a herd was beyond the scope of this study. Pooling is recognized as an efficient and cost-effective method when screening cattle herds for pathogens (41,42,82). Where identification of carriage by individual animals or samples is not required in a first screen, pooling can maintain sensitivity at the herd level, dependant on the expected prevalence (42,83).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooling is recognized as an efficient and cost-effective method when screening cattle herds for pathogens (41,42,82). Where identification of carriage by individual animals or samples is not required in a first screen, pooling can maintain sensitivity at the herd level, dependant on the expected prevalence (42,83). In this study we identified the majority of herds positive for intI1 and intI2 within the first two pools screened per herd, and therefore suggest herd pool screening as a useful tool that could be employed for large scale surveillance of common ARGs within livestock populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation