2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of ductile fracture in pipeline steels under varying constraint conditions using cohesive zone modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the difference in loading mode, the CTOA values between DWTT and pipe are very similar, which lends credibility to the use of the CZM for practical modelling applications. These results agree with the findings of Parmar et al10 and Moon et al11 ; however, this work extends those results by predicting fracture velocity and CTOA. The ability to produce numerical results using the relatively simple CZM that agrees with both small scale (DWTT) and large scale (pipe) geometries lends confidence to the procedure and offers potential for significant advance in the development of a CTOA-based approach to crack arrest.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite the difference in loading mode, the CTOA values between DWTT and pipe are very similar, which lends credibility to the use of the CZM for practical modelling applications. These results agree with the findings of Parmar et al10 and Moon et al11 ; however, this work extends those results by predicting fracture velocity and CTOA. The ability to produce numerical results using the relatively simple CZM that agrees with both small scale (DWTT) and large scale (pipe) geometries lends confidence to the procedure and offers potential for significant advance in the development of a CTOA-based approach to crack arrest.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…For fine-scale studies, micromechanical modelling using a variety of failure criteria can be performed. The computational demands of the analyses vary considerably, with two-dimensional approaches using a cohesive zone or CTOA model being least demanding (see, for example, Parmar et al 47 ) and a full three-dimensional treatment using micromechanical fracture criteria (for example, Simha et al 48 ) being the most demanding. Some examples of FEA analyses involving CTOA are discussed here.…”
Section: Fea Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%