2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of petcoke gasification in slagging moving bed reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The gas yield, Y, was calculated as the outgoing dry gas flow rate per mass flow rate of dry fuel. The gas high heating value, GHHV, was defined as the gross calorific value of dry gas on a volumetric basis.…”
Section: Effect Of Operation Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 The gas yield, Y, was calculated as the outgoing dry gas flow rate per mass flow rate of dry fuel. The gas high heating value, GHHV, was defined as the gross calorific value of dry gas on a volumetric basis.…”
Section: Effect Of Operation Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6].This originates an increase in gas yield and its HHV, which leads to a higher cold gas efficiency. These results agree with the studies published by other authors who employed different types of gasifiers such as pressurized spouted bed and fluidised bed reactors [13,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Reaction Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But some gasification processes have used petroleum coke, the byproduct of coking or refinery processes, as the gasification feedstock in combination with coal or separately to produce syngas that can be used to satisfy the increasing demand for hydrogen by refineries and other applications [4]. Especially the disposal of petroleum coke with high sulfur content has arisen as an urgent problem [5], so the gasification processes using petroleum coke have been developed and used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental performance, feedstock flexibility, capital, and operational costs of different gasifiers were compared by Zheng and Furinsky [19] using ASPEN software. Numerical methods were also employed to solve the steady-state temperature and gas composition distributions in the gasifier [20][21][22]. For instance, Vamvuka and Woodbum [23,24] developed a one-dimensional steady-state model for an entrained flow coal gasifier, and predicted the temperature, reaction rate, and composition profiles in a tubular gasifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%