2017
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simultaneous PET/MR imaging with a radio frequency‐penetrable PET insert

Abstract: Purpose A brain sized radio-frequency (RF)-penetrable PET insert has been designed for simultaneous operation with MRI systems. This system takes advantage of electro-optical coupling and battery power to electrically float the PET insert relative to the MRI ground, permitting RF signals to be transmitted through small gaps between the modules that form the PET ring. This design facilitates the use of the built-in body coil for RF transmission, and thus could be inserted into any existing MR site wishing to ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, RF interference to PET front-end electronics may cause an increase in PET random count rates, triple coincidence count rates and dead time problems (Delso & Ziegler, 2009 Bandwidth (Hz) <2x10 9 <1x10 9 NA potential utilisation of build-in body coil for MR imaging (Grant, Lee, Chang, & Levin, 2017). Integration of PET and the MR RF components requires special consideration to avoid crosstalk between the operating frequencies in both systems.…”
Section: Rf Components and Hardware Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, RF interference to PET front-end electronics may cause an increase in PET random count rates, triple coincidence count rates and dead time problems (Delso & Ziegler, 2009 Bandwidth (Hz) <2x10 9 <1x10 9 NA potential utilisation of build-in body coil for MR imaging (Grant, Lee, Chang, & Levin, 2017). Integration of PET and the MR RF components requires special consideration to avoid crosstalk between the operating frequencies in both systems.…”
Section: Rf Components and Hardware Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration of PET and the MR RF components requires special consideration to avoid crosstalk between the operating frequencies in both systems. For example, RF interference to PET front-end electronics may cause an increase in PET random count rates, triple coincidence count rates and dead time problems (Delso & Ziegler, 2009 Bandwidth (Hz) <2x10 9 <1x10 9 NA potential utilisation of build-in body coil for MR imaging (Grant, Lee, Chang, & Levin, 2017). In general, integration of the two components requires additional shielding which must be carefully considered, as the shielding itself may degrade the uniformity of the static B 0 magnetic field or interact with the gradients of the scanner (Truhn, Kiessling, & Schulz, 2011 (Sander et al, 2015).…”
Section: Rf Components and Hardware Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between standard and SiPM PET detectors are significant. SiPMs having a small physical profile and a negligible electronic noise, offering high gain, and requiring low operating voltage offer several advantages over previously used technologies such as photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and avalanche photodiodes (APDs) [ 13 , 14 ]. Among the potential advantages of SiPM-based PET/CT over standard PET/CT are decreased required dosage of PET radiopharmaceuticals, higher sensitivity, and temporal resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although EPI sequence is a common sequence for brain imaging, it was not performed in the study. As presented from earlier publications, 10,28,29 the intense gradient field slew rate of EPI sequence induced eddy current on the solid copper shielding cage of the RF-penetrable PET insert and suffered from the Nyquist ghosting artifact. To allow the PET ring operable with EPI, various designs and materials for the shielding cage with sufficiently high shielding effectiveness and low induced eddy current have been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%