2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-6493.2005.00175.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sind Nominallohne starr? Neuere Evidenz und wirtschaftspolitische Implikationen

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their view, coordinated wage negotiations are able to react appropriately to macroeconomic shocks and are thus better able to prevent unemployment from increasing. 6 Beissinger and Knoppik (2003) have reviewed studies based on surveys, on experimental studies and microeconometric studies in a number of countries. In contrast to Pfeiffer, they come to the conclusion that downward rigidities of nominal wages are not the result of institutional arrangements but rather of psychological factors.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their view, coordinated wage negotiations are able to react appropriately to macroeconomic shocks and are thus better able to prevent unemployment from increasing. 6 Beissinger and Knoppik (2003) have reviewed studies based on surveys, on experimental studies and microeconometric studies in a number of countries. In contrast to Pfeiffer, they come to the conclusion that downward rigidities of nominal wages are not the result of institutional arrangements but rather of psychological factors.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%