2002
DOI: 10.1007/s001810100111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The symmetry of the wage-change distribution: Survey and contract data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subject to rounding, similar comments hold for the sub-samples. 13 The calculated F value is 0.794 while the critical one is 1.94.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subject to rounding, similar comments hold for the sub-samples. 13 The calculated F value is 0.794 while the critical one is 1.94.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The choice of n = 8 appears reasonable 11 , the fit of the equation is satisfactory, and the representative histogram falls off to zero as n increases to 8. 12 A test for structural homogeneity above and below the median, which tests the symmetry of the wage-change distribution without imposing any distributional restrictions, does not reject symmetry, 13 suggesting that ef- 11 We have experimented with other values of n, the number of percentage-point bars included in the data. The lower value of n = 5 failed to capture needed density when the median rate of wage inflation was high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use data on whether the payslip was checked ± a unique feature of the BHPS ± 1 Recent papers by Christo®des and Leung (1998), Crawford and Harrison (1998) and Fortin (1996) study the issue using Canadian union contract data. Christo®des and Stengos (1998) use these data and some individual data similar to US work and the present study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recent applications of the approaches to individual compensation data include Lebow et al (1995), McLaughlin (1999McLaughlin ( , 2000, Lebow et al (1999), and Nickell and Quintini (2001). Christofides and Leung (2000) and Christofides and Stengos (2000) use union contract data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%