Current therapies of osteoporosis, with the exception of parathyroid hormone, decrease the risk of osteoporotic fractures by reducing bone resorption and preserving its architecture but cannot stimulate bone formation. Studies of rare human bone disorders and genetically modified animal models led to the identification of signaling pathways that regulate bone formation, which provided targets for the development of novel therapeutics for bone diseases. 1 Of particular importance have been studies of two rare bone sclerosing dysplasias, sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease, characterized by increased bone mass due to sclerostin deficiency. 2 Sclerostin, a glycoprotein produced in the skeleton by osteocytes, is a negative regulator of bone formation. 3 The restricted expression of sclerostin in the skeleton, the markedly increased bone mass and bone strength of patients and mice with sclerostin deficiency, and the lack of extraskeletal complications in patients made sclerostin a very attractive therapeutic target in osteoporosis. 4 Consequently, animal studies showed that exogenously administered antibodies to sclerostin increase bone formation at all skeletal envelopes, maintain or decrease bone resorption and increase bone mineral density (BMD) and bone strength. 4 Furthermore, in phase 1 human studies, increases in bone formation and decreases of bone resorption associated with significant increases in BMD were reported after administration of single doses of two different humanized antibodies, romosozumab (Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA), UCB (Brussels, Belgium)) and blosozumab (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA). 5,6 McClung et al. 7 recently reported the results of a phase 2 clinical trial on the efficacy and tolerability of romosozumab in 419 postmenopausal women with low bone mass. This was a typical phase 2 study that compared different doses and dosing intervals of subcutaneous injections of romosozumab with placebo, oral alendronate, 70 mg weekly, and subcutaneous teriparatide, 20 mg daily. The primary efficacy point of the study was the change of spine BMD after 12 months. All doses of romosozumab induced significant increases in BMD. The highest dose of romosuzamab used, 210 mg monthly, increased BMD at the spine (11.3%), total hip (4.1%) and femoral neck (3.7%). These increases were significantly higher than those observed in women treated with either alendronate or teriparatide. For example, the corresponding increases at the spine were 4.1% for alendronate and 7.1% with teriparatide after 12 months. No significant differences in BMD of the distal third of the radius were observed at 12 months between any of the romosozumab groups and the placebo, alendronate or teriparatide groups. Adverse events were similar among all groups of studied women except for mild reactions at the injection sites of romosozumab.These results meet the expectations raised by genetic, animal and phase 1 human studies and establish sclerostin inhibition by romosozumab as a potential new bone building therapy for osteoporosis, ...