2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01088-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Center Experience of Surgical Treatment of Primary Retroperitoneal Tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the short-term results of surgical treatment, for RPSs with abundant blood supply from preoperative imaging examinations, especially those fed from the lumbar artery, middle sacral artery or internal iliac artery, tumour supply vessel embolisation was introduced in clinical practice. Studies have shown that early transarterial embolisation of the tumour supply vessels could signi cantly reduce intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and postoperative complication rate [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the short-term results of surgical treatment, for RPSs with abundant blood supply from preoperative imaging examinations, especially those fed from the lumbar artery, middle sacral artery or internal iliac artery, tumour supply vessel embolisation was introduced in clinical practice. Studies have shown that early transarterial embolisation of the tumour supply vessels could signi cantly reduce intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and postoperative complication rate [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the short-term results of surgical treatment, for RPSs with abundant blood supply from preoperative imaging examinations, especially those fed from the lumbar artery, middle sacral artery or internal iliac artery, tumour supply vessel embolisation was introduced in clinical practice. Studies have shown that early transarterial embolisation of the tumour supply vessels could significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and postoperative complication rate [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%