2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-molecule anisotropic magnetoresistance at room temperature: Influence of molecular structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Many studies also show that the attenuation factor depends on the anchoring groups of the molecules in the MJs. 23,24 The influence of various anchoring groups on junction formation and electrical transport properties has also been established, with anchoring groups investigated including thiol, 25 amino, 26,27 pyridyl, 28,29 carboxylic acid, 30,31 dimethyl phosphine, 25 methyl sulfide, 32 and isocyanides. 29,33 However, for the same molecular backbones, different anchoring groups often (but not always) only weakly affect the attenuation factors of the molecular junction.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Many studies also show that the attenuation factor depends on the anchoring groups of the molecules in the MJs. 23,24 The influence of various anchoring groups on junction formation and electrical transport properties has also been established, with anchoring groups investigated including thiol, 25 amino, 26,27 pyridyl, 28,29 carboxylic acid, 30,31 dimethyl phosphine, 25 methyl sulfide, 32 and isocyanides. 29,33 However, for the same molecular backbones, different anchoring groups often (but not always) only weakly affect the attenuation factors of the molecular junction.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, π-conjugated molecules with nonaromatic systems were reported with lower β values than purely aromatic molecules, such as alkenes (2.2 nm –1 ) and alkynes (0.6 nm –1 ) . Many studies also show that the attenuation factor depends on the anchoring groups of the molecules in the MJs. , The influence of various anchoring groups on junction formation and electrical transport properties has also been established, with anchoring groups investigated including thiol, amino, , pyridyl, , carboxylic acid, , dimethyl phosphine, methyl sulfide, and isocyanides. , However, for the same molecular backbones, different anchoring groups often (but not always) only weakly affect the attenuation factors of the molecular junction. Examples of analysis for the anchoring group’s influence on the attenuation factor include a study from Park et al, where the length dependence of amine, dimethyl phosphine, and methyl sulfide-terminated alkanes was considered and a small difference in the β value of each MJ was found .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, MR properties in SM devices have been also observed using diamagnetic molecules connected to ferromagnetic electrodes. [3,8,[16][17][18] In such scenario, the wired molecule plays no role in the MR response [8] acting as a mere conductor, leaving the control of the MR effect to the relative magnetization orientation of both the spin-drain and spin-source electrodes, which, in turn, is controlled by spinterface effects generated at the molecule/electrodes interface. The latter MR SM junctions are regarded as a molecular approach of giant magnetoresistance "GMR".…”
Section: Molecules With Paramagnetic Centresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetization of the spin-polarized electrode can be done either ex-situ or in-situ by placing a permanent magnet in close proximity to the ferromagnetic electrode. [7,8]…”
Section: Introduction: a Magnetoresistive Single-molecule Device:basi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 When a metal serves as an electrocatalyst, a small modulation in its surface crystal structure will create substantial changes in its contact with adsorbed molecules. 20,21 It is often thought that this feature, in turn, offers an opportunity to improve the performance of electrocatalysts. 22–24 Nevertheless, the in situ modulation of the surface structure with atomic precision remains a challenge in the engineering of metallic crystals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%