1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf02811664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-phase ferritic solidification mode in austenitic-ferritic stainless steel welds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
6

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6][7] Moreover, it is suggested that these properties are related to the crystallographic relationships between d and g. The crystallographic relationships during welds have been evaluated by a number of authors. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Inoue et al [11][12][13][14] analyzed the crystallographic relationships between d and g with EBSPs (Electron Back Scattering Patterns) in weld metals of various solidification modes. They showed that the ͗100͘ direction of ferrite and ͗100͘ direction of austenite were parallel to each other and lay along the preferable growth direction, in the cases of primary austenite solidification with eutectic-d and primary ferrite solidification with a vermicular structure of d. On the other hand, Inoue et al also showed that the austenite had the Kurdjumov-Sachs (K-S) relationship with ferrite, in the cases of primary ferrite solidification with lacy-d and ferrite single-phase solidification with acicular-d or Widmanstätten-g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Moreover, it is suggested that these properties are related to the crystallographic relationships between d and g. The crystallographic relationships during welds have been evaluated by a number of authors. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Inoue et al [11][12][13][14] analyzed the crystallographic relationships between d and g with EBSPs (Electron Back Scattering Patterns) in weld metals of various solidification modes. They showed that the ͗100͘ direction of ferrite and ͗100͘ direction of austenite were parallel to each other and lay along the preferable growth direction, in the cases of primary austenite solidification with eutectic-d and primary ferrite solidification with a vermicular structure of d. On the other hand, Inoue et al also showed that the austenite had the Kurdjumov-Sachs (K-S) relationship with ferrite, in the cases of primary ferrite solidification with lacy-d and ferrite single-phase solidification with acicular-d or Widmanstätten-g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afim de prever o modo de solidificação dos aços inoxidáveis através das expressões de cromo e niquel equivalentes propostas por O. Hammar e Svensson [6,10], Suutala e Moisio [11] rearranjaram os resultados obtidos em diversos trabalhos [5,7,[12][13][14][15][16] com diferentes velocidades de solidificação. Quando a relação Creq/Nieq <1,5 a solidificação poderá ser austenítica (modo I) ou austenítica-ferrítica (modo II).…”
Section: Efeito Dos Gases De Proteção Na Microestrutura E Nas Cinéticunclassified
“…showed that in the Creq./Nieq. range from 1.4 to 1.6, ferrite existed in the form of either vermicular or lacy ferrite, evidencing solidification in the FA mode 6) , and when the ratio was 1.7 or more, it existed in the form of acicular ferrite, evidencing solidification in the F mode 7) . Generally speaking, toughness is higher in FA mode solidification (less amount of ferrite) than in F mode 8) , but some alloy systems in to satisfy the quality targets, and following the guidelines, developed the FCAW welding wire.…”
Section: Guidelines For Development Of New Stainless Steel Andmentioning
confidence: 99%