1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19970330)40:6<1091::aid-nme102>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SINGULARp-VERSION FINITE ELEMENTS FOR STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR COMPUTATIONS

Abstract: SUMMARYThe finite element analysis of linear elastic fracture mechanics problems is complicated by the presence of the singular and finite non-singular stress distributions in the crack tip region. The availability of a constant stress term in addition to the singular term in the standard h-version singular finite elements is insufficient to model the finite nonsingular stress zone. A p-version singular finite element capable of modelling the higher-order non-singular stress terms in addition to the singular t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, the validity of m can be judged by the discrepancy between plots on a figure like Figure 5 and the origin when L/a is made small, in case that analytical SIF solutions are known. Note that the m presented in the numerical examples in this paper satisfies this condition (at least for K I whose accuracy is important for practical problems) and that our error index approximates the SIF error closely for ∆K Recently, Rahulkumar et al [11] proposed an approach to use higher order SEs for an accurate SIF evaluation with a coarse mesh division. However, judging from the results of mixed mode problems discussed in the previous section, it still remains necessary to try to find a proper mesh refinement in the θ direction (selection of m) even though higher order elements are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In any case, the validity of m can be judged by the discrepancy between plots on a figure like Figure 5 and the origin when L/a is made small, in case that analytical SIF solutions are known. Note that the m presented in the numerical examples in this paper satisfies this condition (at least for K I whose accuracy is important for practical problems) and that our error index approximates the SIF error closely for ∆K Recently, Rahulkumar et al [11] proposed an approach to use higher order SEs for an accurate SIF evaluation with a coarse mesh division. However, judging from the results of mixed mode problems discussed in the previous section, it still remains necessary to try to find a proper mesh refinement in the θ direction (selection of m) even though higher order elements are used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In the three-dimensional elastic viscoelastic problems in the hydraulic structure [20], seepage analysis [21], the mechanical response of the arteries in the field of biomechanics of bone problems [22] and sandwich and Kirchhoff plate deformation analysis [23,24], the P-FEM has been also successfully applied. The application of P-FEM in elastic fracture mechanics (including the calculation of SIF and predicting the growth of irregular crack fronts) can be found in references [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Development Of P-femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uni-axial tension rð¼ 1:0Þ is applied along the shorter edges. The same problem was previously solved by Szab o et al [14] using the Contour Integral method, and separately by Rahulkumar et al [15] and Tada et al [16] using singular p-version FEM. Their results are used as benchmarks.…”
Section: Example 3: Rectangular Panel Having An Inclined Crack Subjecmentioning
confidence: 99%