2006
DOI: 10.1080/02726350500403215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Size Distribution of Gold Nanoparticles Used by Small Angle X-ray Scattering

Abstract: The size distribution of gold nanoparticles was estimated based on the scattering intensity data obtained from small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and compared with the result of micrographs by transmission electron microscopy. The slope of the Guinier plot was used to estimate the mean size assuming a narrow particle size distribution. When the size distribution is narrow, the mean size can be easily obtained from slope of a Guinier plot of scattering data within 10% error. Additionally, assuming a lognormal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter technique has several advantages compared with the others. SAXS can be used for analyzing aerosols as well as dispersions and powders [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] whereas dynamic light scattering and AUC can be used only for dispersions and differential mobility analysis only for aerosols. In the case of aggregated samples, it is possible to determine the mean diameter of the agglomerates and also the mean diameter of the primary particles by SAXS [9], which is not possible with the measurement techniques mentioned earlier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter technique has several advantages compared with the others. SAXS can be used for analyzing aerosols as well as dispersions and powders [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] whereas dynamic light scattering and AUC can be used only for dispersions and differential mobility analysis only for aerosols. In the case of aggregated samples, it is possible to determine the mean diameter of the agglomerates and also the mean diameter of the primary particles by SAXS [9], which is not possible with the measurement techniques mentioned earlier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is no limitation imposed by drying or mounting the sample, which can lead to aggregation or other physical change. In recent years many approaches have been developed to determine particle size distributions from SAXS data by assuming Gaussian and/or log normal distributions [9,12,13] and the maximum entropy method (MEM) [15][16][17]. In this paper particle size distributions from the scattering curves of two colloidal, non-aggregated suspensions are determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51,52 SAXS has been used to measure the size of Au NM, with a larger size measured in comparison to TEM as SAXS is again sensitive to the 6th power of the particle diameter (d 6 ). 53 Furthermore, SAXS has been used to infer the aggregation state of Ag NM synthesized using reducing and capping agents. 51 SAXS is however limited by the need to fit and model scattering data 52,53 and is often conducted at a synchrotron.…”
Section: Bulk Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 Furthermore, SAXS has been used to infer the aggregation state of Ag NM synthesized using reducing and capping agents. 51 SAXS is however limited by the need to fit and model scattering data 52,53 and is often conducted at a synchrotron. 51,52 Also, scattering of NM dispersions in biological or environmental media can be dominated by the liquid (and other components in the medium), creating issues for measurement of small NM sizes and dilute concentrations.…”
Section: Bulk Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small angle X -ray scattering (SAXS) uses similar principles to static or dynamic light scattering but the particle sizes that can be probed are much lower ( ∼ 1 -50 nm) than for these due to the lower wavelength of X -ray light (Waychunas et al , 2005 ;Megens et al , 1997 ;Mori et al , 2006 ). There are laboratory versions available but these generally provide too low X -ray intensity for characterization of nanoparticles.…”
Section: Small Angle X -Ray Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%