2018
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2017.2741582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sizing of IPM Generator for a Single Point Absorber Type Wave Energy Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the inflation into account, the active material of this generator in this paper is estimated as 14,655.31 Euros/m 2 . Regarding the manufacturing cost, it is approximately assumed as half of the total cost of the generator [37]. So, the cost of PTO can be expressed as…”
Section: Economic Modeling For Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the inflation into account, the active material of this generator in this paper is estimated as 14,655.31 Euros/m 2 . Regarding the manufacturing cost, it is approximately assumed as half of the total cost of the generator [37]. So, the cost of PTO can be expressed as…”
Section: Economic Modeling For Cost Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a factor 2 is considered to include the manufacture cost and converter cost; CFe, CCu and Cpm are unit price of iron, copper and permanent magnet, and they are assumed to be 3.3 euros/kg, 15.2 euros/kg and 24.7 euros/kg respectively [11]; MFe, MCu and Mpm are the mass of iron, copper and permanent magnet respectively. The grid connection cost is assumed to be 32% of the PTO cost [3].…”
Section: ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the PTO sizing implies the physical limits like force, power and stroke constraints which actually limit the maximum energy absorbed by WECs. On the other hand, for the linear PM generators, the PTO sizing also has an influence on their conversion efficiencies [11]. This last aspect has not yet been considered in our recent paper [3] where the PTO efficiency was assumed to be constant regardless of its size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, PM machines have higher flux densities and lower losses compared to IGs and DFIG and are thus usually more power-dense. As well as, being brushless, they do not need external rotor supply via slip rings unlike DFIGs [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%