2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1651501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skull Base Dural Thickness and Relationship to Demographic Features: A Postmortem Study and Literature Review

Abstract: Dural membrane is an important anatomic structure that surrounds and protects the entire central nervous system. Physical properties of the dura have many pathophysiological and therapeutic implications in cranial surgery, especially skull base disorders. The aim of this study is to investigate variation in skull base dural thickness and correlation with different demographic parameters. At the time of autopsy, the petrous apex dura with the underlying bone of 20 cadavers was harvested. Dural thickness was ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the implication of folding of the TMF in duraplasty on the other abovementioned biomechanical parameters then also has to be explored in depth. The thickness of the TMF samples observed in this study of 1.46 ± 0.41 mm was larger compared with the site-dependent dura thicknesses of 0.36 ± 0.16 mm (petrous apex) 29 , 0.68 ± 0.20 mm (temporal dura presented in this study as a subgroup of recent investigations 21 ), 0.91 ± 1.14 (unspecified area) 13 or 1.11 ± 0.24 mm (craniocervical junction) 30 . However, it has to be noted that the evaluation of dura mater thickness by other research groups has partly been performed on embalmed tissue 13 , likewise introducing a significant bias.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…However, the implication of folding of the TMF in duraplasty on the other abovementioned biomechanical parameters then also has to be explored in depth. The thickness of the TMF samples observed in this study of 1.46 ± 0.41 mm was larger compared with the site-dependent dura thicknesses of 0.36 ± 0.16 mm (petrous apex) 29 , 0.68 ± 0.20 mm (temporal dura presented in this study as a subgroup of recent investigations 21 ), 0.91 ± 1.14 (unspecified area) 13 or 1.11 ± 0.24 mm (craniocervical junction) 30 . However, it has to be noted that the evaluation of dura mater thickness by other research groups has partly been performed on embalmed tissue 13 , likewise introducing a significant bias.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Recently, a study by Fam et al . observed a negative correlation of age with dural thickness of the skull base 36 . Therefore, it might be that the thickness of human cranial dura mater does not generally increase or decrease, but change site-dependently with age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…That the sCSF leak group was 20 years older than both the SSWA and IIH groups suggests that additional age-related factors may be involved. Age-related dural attenuation may be an independent factor increasing the risk of CSF leak (23). Alternatively, or in combination, it may be that more time is needed for both the bony and dural dehiscence that are prerequisites for a sCSF leak to develop (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%