1969
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90168-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow potential changes in cat brain during classical appetitive and aversive conditioning of jaw movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A participation of glial cells has been repeatedly suggested because of the ability of these cells to spatially buffer extracellular K ϩ released during periods of increased neuronal firing~Lux, Heinemann, & Dietzel, 1986!. Also, glial cells can directly respond to different neurotransmitters and neuropeptides with an increase in intracellular Ca 2ϩ concentration~e.g., Laming, 1989;Verkhratsky, Orkand, & Kettenmann, 1998!. In animals cortical DC-potential shifts during drinking and reward, as well as spontaneously occurring cortical slow potential shifts, have been found to coincide with similar shifts in various subcortical structures, where they appear to be most consistent in the hypothalamus~Aladjalova, 1964; Irwin & Rebert, 1970;Rebert & Irwin, 1969;Rowland, 1968!. Moreover, in rabbits slow DCpotential shifts were measured simultaneously in the hypothalamus and cerebral cortex, after hypothalamic stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A participation of glial cells has been repeatedly suggested because of the ability of these cells to spatially buffer extracellular K ϩ released during periods of increased neuronal firing~Lux, Heinemann, & Dietzel, 1986!. Also, glial cells can directly respond to different neurotransmitters and neuropeptides with an increase in intracellular Ca 2ϩ concentration~e.g., Laming, 1989;Verkhratsky, Orkand, & Kettenmann, 1998!. In animals cortical DC-potential shifts during drinking and reward, as well as spontaneously occurring cortical slow potential shifts, have been found to coincide with similar shifts in various subcortical structures, where they appear to be most consistent in the hypothalamus~Aladjalova, 1964; Irwin & Rebert, 1970;Rebert & Irwin, 1969;Rowland, 1968!. Moreover, in rabbits slow DCpotential shifts were measured simultaneously in the hypothalamus and cerebral cortex, after hypothalamic stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Subcortical center activity in conditioning was studied only in the ani mal brain [4][5][6], CNV at the vertex was modulated by the activities of the midline thalamus, midbrain reticular formation and perhaps the lateral hypothalamus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contingent negative variation (CNV) changes its amplitude and response time (RT) by psychological states such as attention, conation and motivation [9]. It might be generat ed by the action of a subcortical center, possibly in the thalamus and the midbrain [5,6]; however, there is no evidence to explain its generating mechanism or modulating effect by alteration of local activity of deep brain structure.In order to know the functional relationship between CNV at the ver tex and activity of the thalamic nucleus (1) the distribution of the thal amic slow potential shift corresponding to S1-S2-R cortical CNV; (2) the modulating effect upon CNV at the vertex by stimulation of the thalamic nuclei, and (3) the alteration of CNV at the vertex following various ther apeutic stereotactic thalamic lesions were studied. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most early conditioning studies of the neural evoked responses have been based on the analysis of the ISI period only; the test–trial approach has not been included or used. The analysis of the ISI period has shown changes in early or late evoked neural components or changes in overall negativity or positivity (Begleiter & Platz, 1969; Chiorini, 1969; lrwin & Rebert, 1970; John, 1967; Macar & Vitton, 1980; Pinto-Hamuy, Bracchitta, & Lagarrigue, 1969; Pirch, Corbus, & Rigdon, 1985; Rebert, 1972, 1976, 1977; Rebert & lrwin, 1969). Here, the overall changes in evoked responses were studied during the omitted-UCS trials to find out whether there appeared specific time–amplitude characteristics (increases in negativity or positivity) corresponding to changes found in the multiple-unit recordings of the NM in rabbits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%