2018
DOI: 10.1109/mts.2018.2826079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart IoT Devices in the Home: Security and Privacy Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Government organizations are taking significant interest in IoT security, privacy and interoperability from legal aspects. This is in alignment with the studies which advocated further collaboration and dialogs between the regulators and manufacturers of IoT devices to develop appropriate methods to tackle the relevant problems [24]. From regulatory perspective, some of the most important legislative requirements are HIPAA for healthcare, MA risk for supply chain management, California's Senate Bill 327, IoT Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017 and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).…”
Section: Legal Aspects Of Privacy In Iot Eramentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Government organizations are taking significant interest in IoT security, privacy and interoperability from legal aspects. This is in alignment with the studies which advocated further collaboration and dialogs between the regulators and manufacturers of IoT devices to develop appropriate methods to tackle the relevant problems [24]. From regulatory perspective, some of the most important legislative requirements are HIPAA for healthcare, MA risk for supply chain management, California's Senate Bill 327, IoT Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017 and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).…”
Section: Legal Aspects Of Privacy In Iot Eramentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The lifecycle of an IoT service or product is shown in Figure 2. • Products which provide audit mechanism while dealing with PII [20] • Products which notify user to provide dynamic consent for data use [37] • Products which stop working properly when consent is not given by user [38] • Firmware upgrade and patchability of IoT devices [24] are available.…”
Section: Consumer-centric Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further on, the comprehensive search of IoT security perception resulted in many (nearly one thousand) quality review conference and journal papers as well as book chapters dealing with IoT security and privacy such as Hwang [40], Abomhara et al [41], Sicari et al [42], Sadeghi et al [43], Roman et al [44], Maple [45], Sivaraman et al [46], Giraldo et al [47], Makherjee et al [48], Yang et al [49], Lin et al [50], Stergiou et al [51], Zhou et al [52], Frustaci et al [53], Miorandi et al [54], Hasan et al [55], Mawgoud et al [56], Tabassum et al [57], Ataç et al [58], Silaghi et al [59], Guan et al [60], etc. They provide overviews of current state in this domain and provide open research challenges and issues to be solved by future research, but all that is out of the scope of this paper, i.e., they do not address the impact of security perception on QoE in the IoT environment.…”
Section: Impact Of Security Perception On Qoementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, Sivaraman et al (2018) states that IoT devices should possess network capabilities.…”
Section: Smart Device In the Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%