“…Due to the fact that smart destination is a new concept and it is important to convey the collected data in detail and directly (Yildirim and Simsek, 2011: 48), the research method was qualitative research and the interview technique was a data collection technique. The semi-structured interview questions were prepared (by using the studies of Aref, 2011; Nam and Pardo, 2011; Wang et al , 2013; Buhalis and Amaranggana, 2014; UNWTO, 2015; Gretzel et al , 2015a, p. 180; Gretzel et al , 2015b; Boes et al , 2016a; Boes et al , 2016b; Nabben et al , 2016; Anthopoulos, 2017; Celik and Topsakal, 2017; Huertas and Moreno, 2017; Jovicic, 2017; UNWTO, 2017; Nguyen et al , 2017; Arslan Ayazlar, 2018; Liberato et al , 2018; UNWTO, 2018; Vecchio et al , 2018; Yalcinkaya et al , 2018a; Yalcinkaya et al , 2018b; European Capital of Smart Tourism, 2021; Ivars-Baidal et al , 2021) for the first time for this research based on both secondhand sources in the literature and the opinions of academicians specializing in smart destination and qualitative research. Questions were created based on the following points: - the tourism activities of Malaga;
- general perspective on smart tourism;
- European Capital of Smart Tourism Competition and Malaga’s success;
- the impacts of smart tourism on the destination, local people and tourists;
- the environmental quality of Malaga;
- the mobility of Malaga;
- shared economy applications;
- how conscious Malaga people are about technology, environment or tourism;
- social and cultural life in Malaga;
- the life quality of disabled people in Malaga;
- the job opportunities and economic conditions in Malaga;
- reasons why tourists prefer Malaga and the role of smart tourism on tourists’ preference;
- the most important problems that tourists can experience in Malaga; and
- tourist loyalty in Malaga.
…”