2000
DOI: 10.1080/713660095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoke Rings: social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By aggregating the nominations of various members of a clique or friendship cluster, a sociogram of the network can be drawn up and individuals assigned to positions relative to the "centre" of this cluster (e.g. Ennett & Bauman, 1993;Pearson & Michell, 2000). This assigned position is then used to predict likelihood of drug use behaviours.…”
Section: Social Network Parameters and Structural Peer Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By aggregating the nominations of various members of a clique or friendship cluster, a sociogram of the network can be drawn up and individuals assigned to positions relative to the "centre" of this cluster (e.g. Ennett & Bauman, 1993;Pearson & Michell, 2000). This assigned position is then used to predict likelihood of drug use behaviours.…”
Section: Social Network Parameters and Structural Peer Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…less people who looked after others or with whom respondents had fun) could have a certain protective function and correspond to individuals that fell largely into categories of low consumers or ex substance users, occasional or frequent drunkenness without drugs, but also with the exception of a minority group of isolated people that tend to use illegal drugs. Other studies report mixed findings, with some finding that being alone led to more drug use (Ennett & Bauman, 1993;Pearson & Michell, 2000) and others that it led to lower use (Abel, Plumridge & Graham, 2002). However studies focused in recreational contexts have normally found isolated people to use drugs less (Ross, Mattison & Franklin, 2003;Thorlindsson & Bernburg, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some studies have found that adolescents who are isolated or rejected from the group are more likely to smoke (Ennett & Bauman, 1993;Pearson & Michell, 2000). This might arise as most young adolescents do not smoke and do not approve of smoking (Tani, Chavez & Deffenbackher, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously this influence can be extended to other elements of personal interactions, "peer pressure" has an important influence on experimental drug use. On this subject, a vast literature exists about the social influence of friendship groups [38] indicating that individuals are influenced (positively or negatively) by their friends but also select which peers they have to mix with in order to find and use drugs [39].…”
Section: Interpersonal Level 1) Peer Pressure/familial Influencementioning
confidence: 99%