2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10270-017-0610-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMTIBEA: a hybrid multi-objective optimization algorithm for configuring large constrained software product lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, parameter tuning may well lead to further improvements in performance. In addition, there is the problem of finding techniques that scale to larger feature models and the potential to incorporate approaches for enhancing the diversity of random products (as already done in the selection of optimal products [26,33]). Finally, there is value in repeating the experiments with other realistic feature models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, parameter tuning may well lead to further improvements in performance. In addition, there is the problem of finding techniques that scale to larger feature models and the potential to incorporate approaches for enhancing the diversity of random products (as already done in the selection of optimal products [26,33]). Finally, there is value in repeating the experiments with other realistic feature models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is related to papers on multi-objective product selection where the goal is to select a product that optimises two or more objectives (see, for example, [26,27,33,34,62]). Compared to them, we address a different problem-the selection of a sequence of products (a test suite)-which means that we could not directly apply the algorithms used for optimal product selection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To overcome the limitations of the above approaches, several authors have proposed optimization techniques to automatically support the configuration process [3,6,12,14,22]. However, these techniques usually return a set of optimal configurations and none of them guides the user in selecting the most appropriate one.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to SATIBEA as the current state‐of‐the‐art optimization method and use it as a baseline algorithm for performance comparison. In addition, Guo et al further proposed the SMTIBEA algorithm, which improves the constraint expressiveness of CNF formulas in SATIBEA from Boolean constraints to quantifier‐free first‐order constraints and supports for solving richer constraints. Since they focus on the constraint expressiveness, our IBEAPORT does not compare the performance with the SMTIBEA.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%