2004
DOI: 10.1894/0038-4909(2004)049<0449:sctprt>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snake (Colubridae: Thamnophis) Predatory Responses to Chemical Cues From Native and Introduced Prey Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, innate preference for native prey by T. hammondii was shown to be modified such that they learned to prefer nonnative prey (Hale 2010). This confirmed the finding that wild-caught T. hammondii preferred nonnatives including centrarchids and an anuran, Xenopus laevis (Mullin et al 2004). Bullfrogs were introduced to California in 1896 (Heard 1904), which might have provided giant gartersnakes enough time to evolve to innately recognize them as alternative prey, especially because giant gartersnakes might have historically consumed a related species, the California red-legged frog Rana draytonii (Rossman et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…For example, innate preference for native prey by T. hammondii was shown to be modified such that they learned to prefer nonnative prey (Hale 2010). This confirmed the finding that wild-caught T. hammondii preferred nonnatives including centrarchids and an anuran, Xenopus laevis (Mullin et al 2004). Bullfrogs were introduced to California in 1896 (Heard 1904), which might have provided giant gartersnakes enough time to evolve to innately recognize them as alternative prey, especially because giant gartersnakes might have historically consumed a related species, the California red-legged frog Rana draytonii (Rossman et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…They use infra-red sensors, usually located in the labial pits, to detect these prey (Gamow and Harris, 1973;Grace et al, 2001;Campbell et al, 2002). Chemical and visual cues may also have an important role in prey detection (Gehlbach, Watkinson and Krool, 1971;Grace et al, 2001;Mullin et al, 2004), especially ectothermic animals. Heavybodied snakes are assumed to be ambush predators (e.g.…”
Section: Foraging Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prepare the olfactory extracts, we employed a combination of two extraction techniques (Burghardt, 1993; Cooper, 1998; Greene, Stark, & Mason, 2002; Holding et al., 2016; Mullin et al., 2004; Pernetta et al., 2009; Weaver et al., 2012). All prey were weighed, and their odor was extracted through aqueous extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prepare the olfactory extracts, we employed a combination of two extraction techniques (Burghardt, 1993;Cooper, 1998;Greene, Stark, & Mason, 2002;Holding et al, 2016;Mullin et al, 2004;Pernetta et al, 2009;Weaver et al, 2012).All prey were weighed, and their odor was extracted through aqueous extraction. Each killed prey was immersed in distilled water at a concentration of 0.25 g/mL for 4 h. After suspension, sterilized swabs (Global swab ltda) of 15 cm were impregnated with the odoriferous solution and passed ten times on the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the live prey's body to increase the odor concentration (Figure S1).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%