2013
DOI: 10.1525/cond.2013.120081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and Genetic Mating System of the American Golden-Plover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, among socially monogamous species, extrapair paternity or maternity discovered with molecular markers and parentage analysis is commonplace (Westneat & Stewart, 2003). Therefore, genetic analysis of parentage is necessary to characterize the genetic mating system of a population and gain insight into the reproductive strategies of individuals that may otherwise be hidden from observation in field studies (Stephen Yezerinac, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, among socially monogamous species, extrapair paternity or maternity discovered with molecular markers and parentage analysis is commonplace (Westneat & Stewart, 2003). Therefore, genetic analysis of parentage is necessary to characterize the genetic mating system of a population and gain insight into the reproductive strategies of individuals that may otherwise be hidden from observation in field studies (Stephen Yezerinac, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although clustering is observed in some smaller shorebird species, the benefits are unclear (Armstrong & Nol, 1993;Fraga & Amat, 1996;Nelson, 2007;Rae et al, 1998). Aggregated nesting in smaller species could provide opportunity for extra-pair copulations, but extra-pair paternity tends to be relatively low in shorebirds and is found primarily in species with low rates of philopatry and mate fidelity (Küpper et al, 2004;Wagner, 1998;Yezerinac et al, 2013). Aggregated nesting is therefore not expected among monogamous and typically territorial calidrine sandpipers (Pitelka et al, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%