1991
DOI: 10.1177/014616729101700209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Attraction, Personal Attraction, and Self-Categorization-, A Field Study

Abstract: A distinction based on social identity theory and self-categorization theory is made between depersonalized (i.e., group prototypical, stereotypical) social attraction and idiosyncratic personal attraction. Only the former; as the affective component of group cohesiveness, is considered to be related to group belongingness. A questionnaire administered after a training session to 28 members of an Australian football team supported the hypotheses. As predicted, group prototypicality was significantly more close… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
141
1
12

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
141
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…This point is consistent with previous research by Hogg and his colleagues (e.g. Hogg, Cooper-Shaw and Holzworth, 1993;Hogg and Hardie, 1991) indicating that when judgement occurs in a group-based context, liking for and agreement with specific individuals (e.g., members of a football team; Hogg and Hardie, 1991) is not determined by their qualities as individuals but is a function of the degree to which they embody group norms (cf Turner, 1987, p. 57). The present results thus extend Hogg's (1 992,p.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This point is consistent with previous research by Hogg and his colleagues (e.g. Hogg, Cooper-Shaw and Holzworth, 1993;Hogg and Hardie, 1991) indicating that when judgement occurs in a group-based context, liking for and agreement with specific individuals (e.g., members of a football team; Hogg and Hardie, 1991) is not determined by their qualities as individuals but is a function of the degree to which they embody group norms (cf Turner, 1987, p. 57). The present results thus extend Hogg's (1 992,p.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Salience is important because individuals are more likely to identify with a salient characteristic, and identification with a characteristic generates positive affect for in-group members (Hogg and Turner 1985;Hogg and Hardie 1991;Hogg 1992Hogg , 1993Hogg and Hains 1996;Grieve and Hogg 1999).…”
Section: Social Similarity and Propinquitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the social identity framework, Hogg and colleagues (Hogg, 1992(Hogg, , 1993Hogg & Hardie, 1991), have drawn a distinction between personal and social attraction. Similarity of personal interests, attitudes and values is the primary basis for personal attraction.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%