2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0008423908081055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Capital and Political Participation of Canadians

Abstract: Abstract. This paper evaluates the importance of social capital for political participation of native-born Canadians and immigrants. The Survey of Social Engagement in Canada, a large survey of Canadians conducted by Statistics Canada in 2003, is used in order to test the role of social relations and connections in accounting for political participation. Analyses show that although the “usual suspects” play important roles in explaining political activities, the main culprit is social capital. Among social cap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the role of social capital for civic and political participation is positive among migrants, as in the general population; however, this effect may vary by country of origin and destination as well as by formality of participation (Lindström, 2005;Togeby, 2004). Level of participation may also vary by period of immigration, with more recent immigrants being less active than earlier cohorts (Nakhaie, 2008).…”
Section: Social Capital Migration and Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the role of social capital for civic and political participation is positive among migrants, as in the general population; however, this effect may vary by country of origin and destination as well as by formality of participation (Lindström, 2005;Togeby, 2004). Level of participation may also vary by period of immigration, with more recent immigrants being less active than earlier cohorts (Nakhaie, 2008).…”
Section: Social Capital Migration and Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A focus on ethnoracial differences in sociocultural integration is important not only because it is a mistake to regard immigrants as homogenous and refugees as a "mass group in flight" (Dobson, 2004, p. 23;Nakhaie & Kazemipur, 2013) but also because newcomer ethnic groups are subject to differential treatment in the host society (Jackson & Bauder, 2013). Nevertheless, research on the sociocultural integration of immigrants, especially those of Muslim background, has been increasing (Brubaker, 2001;Diehl & Koenig, 2013;Joppke, 2004;Kanas & van Tubergen, 2009;Leszczensky, 2013;Maliepaard, Lubbers, & Gijsberts, 2010;Maliepaard & Phalet, 2012;McAndrew & Voas, 2014;Nakhaie, 2018a;Nandi & Platt, 2015;Platt, 2014;Wright et al, 2017), although the results have been inconsistent (e.g., see Alesina & La Ferrara, 2000;Gidengil, Blais, Nevitte, & Nadeau, 2004;Nakhaie, 2008;Scott, Selbee, & Reed, 2006;Stoffman, 2002;Uslaner & Conley, 2003).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ager and Strang (2008) and Giddens (1979) refer to such resources as the "connective tissue" and "vehicles of power," respectively, that enable newcomers to succeed. Research shows that connections with family, friends, and coethnics, involvement in associations, and volunteerism act as structural links that help with information access, employment, housing, material and emotional resources, language translation, cultural mediation, and a sense of belonging, confidence, and capacity-building in Canada and elsewhere (Dorlet & Moorthi, 2018;Makwarimba et al, 2013;Nakhaie, 2007Nakhaie, , 2008Simich, Beiser, & Mawani, 2002;Stewart et al, 2008). Although the social capital, length of residency, and cultural fit models are useful for predicting integration, newcomers still will need mastery of the host language in order to be able to navigate the new society.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have shown that trust is important for governmental decision making and policies (Hetherington & Nugent, 1998), for confidence in governmental institutions (Nye, 1997), for political participation (Kazee & Roberts, 1998;Miller, 1980;Nakhaie, 2008;Southwell, 1985), for willingness to pay taxes (Scholz & Lubell, 1998), for support with capital punishment (Messner, Baumer, & Rosenfeld, 2006), and for securing citizen compliance without coercion (Scholz & Lubell, 1998;Tyler, 1990). 1 Focusing on this institutional trust, Levi's (1997) study of several countries, including Canada and the United States, has shown that compliance with conscription was more frequent where there were high levels of trust.…”
Section: Trust Security and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%