Social eating patterns, identity and the subjective well-being of Chinese teenagers

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the association between eating patterns, social identity and the well-being of adolescents via a mixed methods study of Chinese teenagers. The specific research questions presented in this study are as follows: What is the relationship between social eating and well-being? How is the relationship between social eating and well-being mediated by social identity? Design/methodology/approach This study is based on a sequential mixed methods study, including interviews with 16 teenage–parent dyads, and a large-scale survey of over 1,000 teenagers on their eating patterns, conducted with the support of public schools. A model that tests relationships among social eating, social identity and subjective well-being is developed and tested. Findings The results show that dining with family members leads to improved subjective well-being for teenagers, through a partial mediator of stronger family identity. However, dining with peers is not found to influence subjective well-being. Research limitations/implications The privileged position of family meals demonstrated through this study may be an artifact of the location of this study in one Chinese city. Further research is needed related to the connections among social identity, objective well-being and the social patterns of teenagers’ food consumption behavior. Practical implications To improve the subjective well-being of teenagers, families, public policy-makers and food marketers should support food consumption patterns that promote family meals. Originality/value While many food-related consumer studies focus on the individual, social and environmental influences of food choices of adolescents, few studies address how eating patterns affect overall well-being. These results reinforce the importance of understanding the effect of the social context of teenagers’ eating patterns on health and well-being.

If-then plans help regulate automatic peer influence on impulse buying

“…In line with this reasoning, recent research suggests that heavy multimedia use may increase the susceptibility to an advertisement (Beuckels et al, 2019). It is also likely that peer influence may differ across product categories, such as music (Sinclair and Saren, 2019), dining (Veeck, 2018), "green" products (Lee, 2009) and gift-giving among adolescents (Segev, 2016). The present research, thus, opens up a host of avenues for future research.…”

Can human brands help consumers eat better? Influence of emotional brand attachment, self‐identification, and brand authenticity on consumer eating habits

“…Third, results enrich understanding of the relation between food habits and identity issues that have been discussed in the literature (e.g., Hewer & Brownlie, 2013;Steno & Friche, 2015;Veeck, Yu, Zhang, Zhu, & Yu, 2018). For example, Hewer and Brownlie (2013) highlight the construction and development of the individual and social identity of women in relation to culinary brands.…”

“…Food-related behavioral change is a complex and non-linear process (Cooke, 2004) that cannot be reduced to the influence of consumers' attachment to a brand. Brand attachment represents one factor, however, other influences such as resources (Hearn et al, 1998) and family context (Veeck et al, 2018) must be considered.…”

Researching family food decision making processes: highlights, hits and pitfalls when including young children’s perspectives

“…However, the need to consider family negotiation as relational rather than individualistic win-lose situations has been recognized by several researchers recently (Commuri and Gentry, 2000; Kerrane et al , 2012). Seeing children as similar to adults but with different skills and competences in line with Punch’s (2002) third approach, we take a qualitative, interpretative approach (Kvale and Brinkmann, 2009) that allows for understanding even very young children’s perspectives and priorities related to family members’ roles in food consumption, noting that most qualitative consumer studies engaging children prefer to include (Kerrane et al , 2015; Veeck et al , 2018) or offer advice (Tinson, 2009) on research with “tweens” or adolescents. While acknowledging that young children do not possess the cognitive capabilities as older children or adults, we understand childhood as embedded in a cultural and social context (James et al , 1998), seeing even young children as active, competent and capable of sharing insight on their everyday lives, including the consumption contexts of which they are an important part.…”