2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social exclusion, location and transport disadvantage amongst non-driving seniors in a Melbourne municipality, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, low-quality and unreliable transit systems are unlikely to satisfy the complex needs of different clusters of senior adults (Davey, 2007;Engels and Liu, 2011;Hildebrand, 2003;Kostyniuk and Shope, 2003;Risser et al, 2010). In recent years, demand-responsive transportation and car-sharing services have provided a middle ground between owning a car and being entirely carless.…”
Section: Built Environment Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, low-quality and unreliable transit systems are unlikely to satisfy the complex needs of different clusters of senior adults (Davey, 2007;Engels and Liu, 2011;Hildebrand, 2003;Kostyniuk and Shope, 2003;Risser et al, 2010). In recent years, demand-responsive transportation and car-sharing services have provided a middle ground between owning a car and being entirely carless.…”
Section: Built Environment Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the alienation of younger segments of the population from traditional cultures of automobility, and the increasing inability of older segments of the population to participate due to physiological or economic reasons (Engels and Liu, 2011), there would appear to be substantive grounds to expect automobility to have peaked in many countries. However, we argue (along with Cohen, 2012) that such an analysis may be misplaced due to the shift in automobility culture from individualism and freedom to dynamic seclusion in a securitised state (Wood, 2009) made possible at the individual level by the physical and psychological comfort offered by contemporary cars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are women, elderly, children and youths under 18, people with special needs, etc. (Hine & Mitchell 2003;Engels & Liu 2011;Shergold & Parkhurst 2012;Mackett & Thoreau 2015). In their case, personal mobility is the lowest (according to the Fig.…”
Section: Transport and Social Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 94%